if you had repaired it when it was first damaged, it would be an easy
choice. But in this case, you have to CONVINCE the "others" that they also
damaged it.
Since you did not replace it when it was damaged, you would have no
case in a court.
If you have collision coverage on your vehicle, the damage is covered under your policy. Your insurance company will then attempt to recover ("subrogate") the responsible parties insurance carrier....or the responsible party directly if they were not covered by insurance. If you do not carry collision coverage on the damaged vehicle, your only avenue of recovery is through the responsible parties insurance carrier or, the responsible party directly if they were not insured.
ER - 1994 Responsible Parties 5-21 was released on: USA: 13 May 1999
All the parties who share the common fencing are equally responsible for it's repair or replacement. The owner of the property on which the tree was located is only responsible for their "fair share" not for the entire amount.
The parties involved.
All of the named parties.
Third Watch - 1999 Responsible Parties 1-5 was released on: USA: 31 October 1999
Third Watch - 1999 Responsible Parties 1-5 is rated/received certificates of: Argentina:13
It's an initial meeting between two (2) or more parties.
the prime minister and the governor
Both parties will lose their license if a police report is taken. Both parties are still responsible for all damage incurred or injuries.
Yes, it is possible to be responsible. The primary insurance holder is always responsible for all the debts incurred. And it is considered a benefit to both parties.
the repair shop. I would say the party or parties that stole the vehicle are responsible.