No. Fish are a separate classification simply called "fish": they are not amphibians, which include frogs, toads, newts and salamanders. A major difference between the two classifications is that amphibians breathe using gills or spiracles when they are young and develop lungs as they grow and undergo metamorphosis: fish rely on gills for their entire lives.
An amphibian initially must spend its life in the water until metamorphosis is complete, while a fish spends its whole life in the water.
No, a fish is not an amphibian. An amphibian is a cold-blooded vertebrate that spends part of its life in the water and part on land, while a fish spends its whole life in the water.
No, fish can not live out of water. yes it is the most similar animals out there
amphibians
Amphibians
Fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals are all vertebrates. They all have a backbone and internal bones.
neither. its a fish. you put reptile twice by the way.
a clam is a crustacean
Fish are fish, their own group. Frogs are amphibians though.
Fish, and then amphibians, and then reptiles, and then mammals
No. Clownfish are fish. Amphibians include frogs, salamanders and caecilians.
Fish, reptiles, and amphibians, originated in that order during the Paleozoic era.
axotles = amphibians
Fish
Fish appeared earlier. Amphibians later branched off from them.
Fish aren't amphibians. Among other things, amphibians can breathe out of water, something most fish can't do.
the amphibians have a three chambered heart whilst the fish have a two chambered heart.
fish, specifically "mud" fish or lung fish.
The ancestors of all living amphibians were fish-like animals.
Fish have gills all their lives while amphibians eventually begin using their lungs. Fish have scales, and they must live in water to survive.