There is more freedom in contractual law where as in tortuous liability it is more of imposed nature. The claimant will receive compensation for damages and expected earnings in the case of contract liability where as the claimant can only claim damages as in the case of tortuous liability. There is more privacy in the contract in the case of contractual liabilities as the parties who are involved in the contract are the one who can actually sue for damages as in the case of ATKIN V SOUNDERS(1942) whereas in tortuous liabilities any one as a third party who had suffered losses or damages can claim compensation from the defendant.
These are separate, although sometimes converging areas of law and liability. Contractual liability means that a party to a contract has somehow breached the contract and when taken to court will be held liable for the contract or at least for the loss to the nonbreaching party as a result of the breach. Tort is a separate type of liability that has to do with civil wrongs and gives a cause of action for the injured party. For example, an individual tripping and falling in a grocery store on a puddle of water may have a tort claim but would not have a contract claim against the store.
more briefly, most briefly
briefly
more briefly
Property loss exposure: If you home was burned down not intentionally caused by you or other residents relatives caused of your household. Liability loss exposure; If you accidentally hit a golf ball and broke another homeowners window.
No, briefly is an adjective.
Briefly is the correct spelling.
Briefly is an adverb.
Ho Chi Minh was with the Communist party. Ngo Dinh Diem was a nationalist and pro-western. Both had been educated abroad.
You would say "Jack and Jill talked briefly."
chemistry briefly
martin Luther believed that the only 'true' sacraments were those that appeared in detail in the bible, marriage is not considered a sacrament because in the bible it is written about only briefly, in contrast to baptism for example