answersLogoWhite

0

Can DNA convict someone

Updated: 9/17/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can DNA convict someone
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can DNA on a cigarette at the scene of a robberey and a persons passed record be enough to convict a person?

No, it's not enough evidence to convict someone. You know that they were there, and you can definitely consider them a suspect, but you can't make a definite conviction.


How is DNA fingerprinting commonly used?

to convict criminals or overturn convictions


What part of speech is the word convict?

If we convict someone of a crime, it is a verb. A convict, meaning a person serving a prison term, is a noun.


Can you write a sentence using the word exonerate?

The convict hoped a DNA test would exonerate him.


Why is DNA fingerprinting reliable?

DNA fingerprinting is reliable because with that they can convict or acquit individuals of criminal offenses because every person is genetically unique.


How is biotechnology used to solve crimes?

DNA evidence can help convict criminals or show that an accused person is innocent.


How is forensic evidence used in solving crimes?

Forensic evidence, such as DNA, fingerprints, impressions, is used to determine the identity of the person who committed the crime. Fingerprints and DNA are specific to a single person and can therefore be used to convict someone. Impressions, such as shoe impressions, help to narrow down the list of possible suspects.


How long can you go to jail for shooting at someone?

25 years convict to death


The convict was expected to shoot at us What is that sentence in active voice?

The sentence needs an agent (someone to perform the action of the verb)."We expected the convict to shoot at us" is active voice. We is the agent.People expected that the convict would shoot at us.


Can DNA on a cigarette at the crime scene of a robbery be enough to convict someone?

Not necessarily. It would depend on how much other evidence there is. By itself, DNA on a cigarette only proves that the suspect was physically present at the scene of the crime. It proves he was there at some unknown time, but it does not prove that he was there during the commission of the crime or that he committed the crime. It is a compelling piece of evidence, but it would need to be accompanied by other evidence, in order to ensure a conviction. For example, if eyewitnesses saw the suspect's car fleeing the scene, and if bullets matching those used in the crime were found at the suspect's home, THAT, combined with the DNA on the cigarette, would probably be enough to convict.


How many witnesses needed to convict someone of treason?

2


What evidence do you need to convict someone of using a mobile phone while driving?

A Picture Of Him...