A Judge can do whatever he/she wants, especially in child matters. If at the time of the hearing evidence is presented that shows a change is needed and such change is in the manifest best interest of the child, a Judge will eat crow and worry about the consequences with the appellate later rather than leave a child behind.
Laws and precedents require a judge to rule on matters brought before a court. It sounds like you may be asking about a Writ of Habeas Corpus, which is a legal action requesting the court to rule on the appropriateness of continuing to hold a prisoner.
Exclusive jurisdiction
A law cannot prevent a judge's decsion as the judge is sworn to abide by the law in accordance with the facts that are presented to them in court.The judge, personally, may not care for the decision they are forced to render, but they must rule in accordance with the law as it is written, or risk having their decision overturned on appeal.
A "stay" can only be issued by a judge. If a stay is desired by a participant in the case, their only option is to present a motion to the judge requesting it. The judge will consider and rule on your motion either granting it, or not.
Judge will rule on the case as it is presented. Most likely granting the divorce as long as you have proven the facts in the bill of complaint.
The ball must be presented once. The ball must only be presented once. This is done by putting the ball in the glove before starting the pitch.
The judge's function in a trial by jury, is to rule on matters of law and evidence and ensure the trial is conducted properly in accordance with applicable law. But, it is the jury's verdict which IS the final decision. Depending upon the type of trial the judge MAY have some leeway in in sentencing or levying a punishment or fine.
That'a question only the judge can rule on, but - he has to be asked (in the form of a motion) to rule on it.
Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.
home rule
That would be judicial misconduct. A judge is supposed to only rule on issues before the court of jurisdiction.
The judge feels that a rule of the court has been broken. *