You haven't mentioned whether there is any existing custody order. If the person who has been taking care of the child never bothered to formalize their authority and there is no legal guardianship then the mother can take the child.
You haven't mentioned whether there is any existing custody order. If the person who has been taking care of the child never bothered to formalize their authority and there is no legal guardianship then the mother can take the child.
You haven't mentioned whether there is any existing custody order. If the person who has been taking care of the child never bothered to formalize their authority and there is no legal guardianship then the mother can take the child.
You haven't mentioned whether there is any existing custody order. If the person who has been taking care of the child never bothered to formalize their authority and there is no legal guardianship then the mother can take the child.
You haven't mentioned whether there is any existing custody order. If the person who has been taking care of the child never bothered to formalize their authority and there is no legal guardianship then the mother can take the child.
no
Absolutely. All you need to do is prove that the other person is the biological parent. Get a DNA test done and then file for child support.
Ask them, a parent, child or other relative.
Having a child does not emancipate the parent. It does give them certain rights in regard to taking care of the child.
The parents need to know where their child is and who they are with. This protects the child and the person who takes the child someplace.
* Unfortunately, you did not give any reason as to why the birth parent is giving up their young child to a relative. If at all possible; even if it means government assistance the birth parent should try to keep their child. If it's absolutely impossible then all the birth parent can do is try to explain to the child the best they can, but it will never be enough and the child will feel unloved by the birth parent. Eventually the child will grow accustomed to being raised by a relative, but will eventually grow up and want to know why their birth parent did this. The least the birth parent can do is write a heart-felt letter explaining the circumstances as to why they had to give the child up and give the letter to the relative and when the child is old enough to understand and asks 'Why did my birth parent give me up' then they can read the letter. The birth parent should keep in touch with the relative to see how their child is and at some future date and providing the child wants too then the birth parent and child should meet when that child is no longer a minor.
It is if you never see your child because you are the rightful parent and deserve to see your child and this can be resolved by taking the person to court.
A birth father is a genetic father of a child, as opposed to an adoptive father or stepfather.
Not necessarily. A person that is on a birth certificate, but is not really the child's father, is just taking responsibility for them. They can't really get into any trouble, legally.
Because that child still needs support and the birth parent is the one who should pay it.
Not if your the parent taking care of the child.
It could be if they didn't have permission from the adoptive parent.