No, being a widow has no impact. The beneficiary has already been designated. As a designated beneficiary, the child or the child's legal gaurdian may have a right to receive the benefits on the designated child's behalf. The designation of the child as beneficiary under the policy by the Insured indicates the decedents clear intent that the child should benefit from the policy.
Yep, as long as it can be proven the child is his, it would have to be added to the policy though to take effect
I can't find any evidence that he ever had a child out of wedlock.
An out of wedlock child is entitled to the same share as an in wedlock child. It is the biology that is crucial and not marital status. You should check the laws of intestacy in your jurisdiction.
No.
It means that the mother and father of the child were not married
Yes, Mary Wollstonecraft did have a child out of wedlock with Gilbert Imlay. They had a daughter named Fanny Imlay in 1794.
Yes, he does have a child out of wedlock.
Yes, he does have a child out of wedlock.
Yes.
Literally 'child of the sun', a child born out of wedlock
Joh'Vonnie
Joh'Vonnie