Want this question answered?
outside Parties
They are submitted by amicus curie, or friends of the court. Usually these are people or organizations that are interested in the outcome of an appellate decision, even though they are not directly involved.
Amicus curiae is a Latin term that translates to "friend of the court." It refers to a person or group who is not a party to a legal case but offers information or expertise to assist the court in making a decision. Amicus curiae briefs are often submitted by individuals or organizations with a strong interest or expertise in the subject matter of the case.
using the court system
They support it and have lobbied in favor of it, including filing amicus briefs with the US Court of Appeals.
They support it and have lobbied in favor of it, including filing amicus briefs with the US Court of Appeals.
The US Supreme Court case with the most amicus briefs is probably Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which dealt with racial segregation in public schools. In that case, the Court received a record-setting number of amicus briefs as individuals and organizations across the country weighed in on the issue of school desegregation. The exact number of amicus briefs is difficult to determine, but estimates range from 130 to over 140.
The vehicle through which representatives of special interest groups are able to express opinions on matters before the Court is called an amicus curiae (pl. amici curiae), or "friend of the court" brief (or sometimes academic paper) related to questions of law or fact in the case at bar.The group or individual filing the brief is not a party to the case, and has no legal standing to participate in litigation, but has an interest in the outcome. Often, the amicus presents a point of law or of psychological or sociological relevance to the case.For more information about amicus briefs, see Related Questions, below.
It is a "friend of the court" brief. In important cases (typically in the US Supreme Court, but sometimes in other courts), organizations that are not involved in the dispute sometimes file briefs, inserting an argument for why the court should rule one way or the other. For example, in a case like Brown v. Board, where an individual is suing the school system asking that the schools be racially integrated, the court must determine whether or not it is legal for the system to segregate schools. Organizations such as NAACP would file amicus briefs, arguing that segregating is illegal.
Public Opinion is a huge one. Since the eye of the people is so close on the Supreme Court given the consequences of its decisions, there is evidence that the Supreme Court is affected by the will of the people. Also, amicus briefs can influence Supreme Court votes.
by filing lawsuits
Friend of the court.