No. However, the child may be eligible for public assistance, depending on the family's circumstances.
report that you are no longer a dependent receiving benifit of this support.
Hire an attorney to reopen the matter.
yes i hope he win
Assumed minimum wage
This question is a complicated one in that the laws of paternity do not necessarily establish the biological father as the father for child support purposes but rather look to the circumstances surrounding the case. Your husband is what is known as a presumed father, which is essentially a man that was married to the mother when the child was born, legally agreed to be the father of his wife's child (by signing the birth certificate, and has acted and behaved as the child's father. You cannot receive child support from both the presumed father (if he is still your husband) and the biological father (assuming he admits to being the father) and a court would likely determine your husband to be the father for purposes of child support.
Many left the South in search of jobs in factories to support being free and no longer being supported by their owners. But many stayed in the South and started their own communites where they also searched for jobs.
no
report that you are no longer a dependent receiving benifit of this support.
There is no amendment in the US Constitution regarding State governments being no longer necessary. What the US Constitution does say is that whatever the US Constitutions laws do not cover, belong to the individual States to determine.
A state or feeling of being dissatisfied with the people in authority and no longer willing to support them.
No. Child support orders do not automatically change according to the obligated parent's circumstances. The parent receiving the support must file a new child support petition or a petition to have the exisiting order amended. The court decides if such action is warranted based on the change of circumstances. In the case cited it is unlikely the court would agree to amending the exisiting order, as the child of the marriage is still being supported by the father regardless of the way in which it is being done.
Yes. The child does not need to be named after the father for him to be obliged to pay child support. He needs to be the biological father, that's all. Child support obligations arise from being the biological parent of a child and not on the child's name.
Yes, its child support. If the money is not used to support the child then its being misused. Alimony would be to support you. If the father is looking after the child, then he should not be paying child support to the mother - she doesn't have the cost of looking after the child at that time. In fact, the mother may well be in a position to send chilod support to the father - it goes both ways and she is responsible for the child just as much as the father is.
Hire an attorney to reopen the matter.
yes i hope he win
Assumed minimum wage
Is he being denied access?