Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...

Can you be held responsible for a child without a DNA test being taken?

[Edit]

Answer

A DNA test can only prove that you are NOT the father. If you were married at the time or if were not married and the mother claims that you were the father, the courts will assume that you are responsible. It is your obligation at that point to prove otherwise.

Not if you contest the suit/act naming you as the father.

DNA testing establishes parentage and rules out the possibility of parentage.

It is the responsibiity of the mother who files for child support to prove that the person named as the father is the father.

It is the responsibiiity of a father seeking custodial rights to prove he is the father or seeking to be relieved of parental obligation that he is not the father.

Obviously either type of suit will determine parentage.

Improve Answer Discuss the question "Can you be held responsible for a child without a DNA test being taken?" Watch Question

First answer by Redbeard. Last edit by Cya. Contributor trust: 525 [recommend contributor]. Question popularity: 20 [recommend question]

Research your answer:

Answers.com > Wiki Answers > Categories > Relationships > Parenting and Children > Can you be held responsible for a child without a DNA test being taken?

Our contributors said this page should be displayed for the questions below. (Where do these come from)
If any of these are not a genuine rephrasing of the question, please help out and edit these alternates.
Are nigerian businessman socially responsble?  Can you be held responsble for the baby with out a dna?  Can you be held responsible for a child without a dna test?  Ho is responsible if you have joint custody can you be held responsible for child action while with her?