That would be kind of tough, since most of its explanations and predictions
have been verified in thousands of experiments over the past hundred years.
For one example: One of the predictions that falls out of the Relativistic math is
the way that time becomes distorted or "dilated" when two objects have a high
velocity relative to each other. That math was used in the design of the whole
Global Positioning System. GPS would not work without the allowances built in
for the effects of Relativity.
yes, Einstein theory of special relativity was widely acepted......................................and had not been proved wrong yet
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread... I am not about to suggest that I know a flaw in any theory, let alone those of Einstein. They don't call him an 'Einstein' for nothin'. But scientists do point out that Einstein's equations apparently break down at what we would call today a singularity. It seems too that for this and other reasons, Quantum Theory may one day supplant Relativity. It was once thought that Relativity and Quantum Theory could not co-exist; there are now some possibilities that they can be reconciled. Whether or not the theories of Relativity are proven wrong, they were central to an amazing burst of insight on the part of many great scientists in the early decades of the 20th century.
I didnt check on the net for this but i guess if he were alive today his greatest fear would be if someone proved his theory of relativity wrong he feard fear itself. he also feard germany working on atomic bombs
they make theories/ laws of about the universe or take theories and improve them or adjust them or say it's completely wrong and once they make/adjust/modify... they give it to expirmental physicist and the expirimental physicists will try to prove you wrong once it's correct you've got yourself a theory :)
Some scientist say that E=MC2 is wrong because neutrinos are faster than light. As of 2014, it has not been proven wrong, but there are scientist working to see if they can prove it wrong.
yes, Einstein theory of special relativity was widely acepted......................................and had not been proved wrong yet
according to it is not fully correct but it can apply to most of the particles
The Relativity of Wrong was created in 1988.
If you think its relativity you are wrong.
A theory is something you think, that you try to prove correct or wrong through a series of trials and research.
The general feeling among physicists now is that General relativity is an effective field theory. That is , it derives from a more fundamental theory like quantum gravity.
In the following order: Heliocentric theory of the solar system (Aristarchus of Samos, 270 BCE) Natural Selection (Darwinian evolution, 1858) Theory of the hydrogen atom (as a small negatively charged particle inside a larger positively charged particle, 1904, the plum pudding model) Theory of relativity (special relativity, 1905) Theory of relativity (general relativity's initial paper on the acceleration of objects within the framework of special relativity, 1907) Theory of the hydrogen atom (as a small particle orbiting the atomic nucleus, 1909, the Rutherford or Planetary model) Theory of the hydrogen atom (as an "electron cloud" surrounding the atomic nucleus, 1913, the quantum mechanical or Bohr model) Theory of relativity (general relativity and its ability to warp space-time, 1915) So heliocentrism was, by about two millenia, the first. Relativity and the model of the hydrogen atom are intricately intertwined, so which came first depends on what you mean specifically.
No, that was done by Aristotle. Diogenes also proved it wrong simply by out-racing a tortoise. A final, formalized refutation was done by mathematicians in the late 1800s.
You can't. These two things are not the same thing and neither is a theory. Perhaps you need to consider where you went wrong.
Depends what you mean by "completed." Both special and general relativity are "complete" in that they fully describe that part of the Universe that they INTEND to describe. However, neither describes EVERYTHING. General relativity, for example, is a more complete theory than is special relativity. However, even GR is useful only for gravity, saying nothing about electro-magnetism (EM) in our Universe. Einstein was fully cognizant of this fact, and figured it would take a decade or so AT MOST to add EM to a fuller theory of relativity. Unfortunately, he was wrong -- not only is EM no closer to being combined with GR today than it was in 1915, but we now know that there are other forces we need to integrate into a more general theory! And even WORSE, we now know about quantum mechanics, which is mathematically IMPOSSIBLE to combine with GR. The final "completion" of relativity -- an combination of all forces with GR and QM -- still awaits us. If any person is able to devise a "Theory of Everything," s/he would go down in history in the same vein as Einstein or Newton.
The verb for proof is prove.Other verbs depending on the tense are proves, proving and proved.Some example sentences are:"I will prove this theory"."This proves he did it"."I am proving you wrong"."The theory was eventually proved".
A "theory" refers to an idea which may or may not have been scientifically tested and/or well documented. The main point about a theory is that it is always open to being proven wrong. Example: my cat is black and everyone observing it says it is black. So a theory can be stated thus: "I have a theory that my cat is black". So far, that theory has been 100% supported during repeated testing. The Theory of Relativity concerns the structure of space, time and motion.