0
Compare the arguments for and against the Constitution made by the Federalists and Antifederalists during the struggle over ratification?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the Bill of Rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed.
This is right luv
Elianny Cruz
Wiki User
∙ 14y agothe federalists it has to fix and the antifederalists it is very power
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What strategies made the federalist arguments of the constitution successful?
promise of a bill of rights and compromise with anti-federalists
What major arguments did the anti Federalist offer in opposition to ratification of the constitution?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
What arguments did the federalists use against having a bill of rights?
The argument of the federalists is that the constitution gave the nationalists the strong national government that had wanted. Federalists felt that the Constitution provided the necessary protection already and the Bill of Rights was unnecessary. Also, the Bill of Rights pointed out rights that the government didnt have, therefore outlining the powers the government didnt have gave the appearance that the government had more powers than it actually did.
How did the federalist respond to concerns from the antifederalists?
Answer on E2020:The Federalists created a system of checks and balances in the government. This system limited the power of the various branches of government so that one branch could not take all the power and become tyrannical. Each branch was also able to 'check' the powers of the other branches, so that no branch could act alone.
What arguments did the federalists papers make for ratification?
The Federalist Papers argued that the new Constitution would create a strong national government, which was needed, but it would also protect the minorities and factions. The new government would also, in the development of federalism, protect the citizen from a too powerful national government. The papers also tried to explain how each branch of the national government would function.
What arguments did the federalists make to support ratification of the Constitution?
The federalists made a number of arguments to support the ratification of the constitution. They preferred a strong national government since they believed that if the states had too much power it would result into so many other confederacy governments within the states.
What 3 main arguments of the Federalists and the Anti- Federalist?
they supported the right to tax the country, the ratification of the constitution, and they supported a strong central [federal] government
How did anti-fedralist present arguments against ratification?
The Anti-Federalists argued that a new Constitution would be a step towards monarchy and that the country would be bled dry through state and federal taxation.
What were sectional arguments caused by?
People who favored ratification of the new Constitution were called
The federalists or the antifederalists had the more valid arguments?
There is no doubt that the Anti-Federalist had some very valid arguments but in many ways, their principles seemed to be flawed. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution was an attempt to fuse the government into one nation and for them this would undermine any authority the states had. The contention of this argument was on the basis that, "there was an inherent connection between the states and the preservation of individual liberty, which is the end of any legitimate government.
Describe and justify the position of the anti-Federalists regarding the opening phrase of the Constitution you the People of the US?
Differing views on these questions brought into existence two parties, the Federalists, who favored a strong central government, and the Antifederalists, who preferred a loose association of separate states. Impassioned arguments on both sides were voiced by the press, the legislatures, and the state conventions. In Virginia, the Antifederalists attacked the proposed new government by challenging the opening phrase of the Constitution: "We the People of the United States." Without using the individual state names in the Constitution, the delegates argued, the states would not retain their separate rights or powers. Virginia Antifederalists were led by Patrick Henry, who became the chief spokesman for back-country farmers who feared the powers of the new central government. Wavering delegates were persuaded by a proposal that the Virginia convention recommend a bill of rights, and Antifederalists joined with the Federalists to ratify the Constitution on June 25.
What strategies made the federalist arguments of the constitution successful?
promise of a bill of rights and compromise with anti-federalists
What arguments did the the federalists make to gain approval of the Constitution?
The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.
What most accurately describes anti-federalists?
Anti-Federalists were those who opposed ratification of the Constitution of the United States created by the delegates at the Constitutional Convention. The Anti-Federalists feared centralized power, one of the arguments used in declaring independence from Great Britain. They also believed that republican institutions, like the government created by the Constitution, could only survive in small countries. Many Anti-Federalists agreed to drop their opposition to the new government under the Constitution, only when it was agreed that a Bill of Rights would be added by the first Congress.
What is the significance of the Ferderalists Papers?
The Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton were arguments for the ratification of the new Constitution. They com batted the "antifederalists", who complained that the new draft emphasized too much power on the central government and gave the states too little power.
What are the main arguments for ratification of the Constitution?
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
What major arguments did the anti Federalist offer in opposition to ratification of the constitution?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
