answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

critically examine austins theory of law

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Critically access john Austin's command theory of law?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Critically examine recardian theory of trade?

ortu


Critically examine the fisher's version of quantity theory of money?

mv=pt


Critically analysis of normative accounting theory?

if i know why would i look for this plz answer soon .


How many hours from Paris to Oakland CA?

critically wxamine holbson's theory of imperialism


Critically examine the optimum theory of Population How does it differ from Marthus theory of Population?

Type your answer here... distinguish between top down and bottom up planning strategy


What is space command theory?

you get a rocket and fly into space


What theory is the type of theory of power that argues that many people have access to power?

pluralist


What is the Difference between imperative theory and pure theory of law?

command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.


Critically examine Savigny's theory of law?

The below link will lead you to some information about Savigny and his work and theories, however, you must do your own work.


What is the central command theory of cardiovascular control?

Central Command Theory states that: The initial cardiovascular response to exercise is stimulated by neural signals from the brain. Basically, It states that the brain causes the temporary adaptations to exercise, not local factors.


What theory holds that ordinary people have access to power?

pluralist


Critically examine the marxist theory of rights?

Marxist theory of rights challenges traditional liberal conceptions by arguing that rights are products of specific historical and social conditions that serve to perpetuate capitalist power structures. They see rights as inherently limited and insufficient in addressing systemic inequalities, advocating for a more transformative approach that prioritizes collective rights over individual ones. Critics argue that this perspective may downplay the importance of individual freedoms and potentially sacrifice human rights in the pursuit of collective goals.