President George Bush actually went to Congress and got Congress's approval for the use of Military Force, which is a type of war declaration. There were actually at least three such war authorizations that would apply to Iraq. Any one of them would have been well within the requirement of the Constitution.
The "Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq" was approved by Congress in October 2002.
Congress had previously given the Commander-in-Chief a very general authority for the War on Terror, which would include war in or against Iraq, which was a known and proven supporter and haven for terrorists. That authorization was granted just after 9/11.
And George W. Bush could have invaded Iraq under authority of the Iraq War resolution of 1991 that his father G. H. W. Bush had been granted by Congress. Why? Because Saddam had never surrendered in that war, since the end of the active campaigns to take back Kuwait there had been a series of ceasefires, breakings of the ceasefire, and continuing missile and air raids by the US to enforce the ceasefire agreements -- the war was in low-grade sort-of-pause but it was still a war. That's not a "loophole"!
Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.Julius Caesar did not declare himself dictator of Rome. The senate declared him dictator according to Roman law.
Cabinet members are appointed by the President; with Senate approval.
In ancient Rome whether to declare war or not was debated in the senate. The issue was then referred to the Assembly of the Soldiers, which voted on war and peace.
the senate must have two thirds approval for the president to appoint officials the senate must have two thirds approval for the president to appoint officials
Thomas Jefferson, without Senate approval. When reminded that the Senate was responsible for ratification of any treaty negotiated by the President, Jefferson was quoted as saying "the less we say of this affair, the better".
The President can declare war with other countries, but with the approval of the Senate.
a present may not fire someone confirmed by the senate without senate approval...
Treaties are not final until the Senate approves them.
The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.The senate, by consulting and debate, would declare a war.
False----- Nova Net Answer
The senate has final approval on treaties.
False . . . Nova Net
Yes
No exactly- the Senate must approve or ratify a treaty before it becomes binding, but the president can propose or negotiate them without Senate approval. Other countries as aware that Senate approval will be needed before treaties become finalized.
Chaos would ensue
No. He still needs approval from congress.
yes