0
Did the Constitution and the Constitution of the US both call for a body called the Supreme Court?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
In the US, the Constitution and the Constitution of the United States is the same thing; they aren't two different documents, so there is no "both."
Yes, Article III of the Constitution (aka US Constitution, Constitution of the United States) required Congress to establish one Supreme Court, and also permitted them to create whatever "inferior courts" (meaning lower than the Supreme Court) they needed to handle the federal government's legal business.
Article III, Section I
"The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office."
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are not true about both the Iroquois constitution and the constitution of the US?
Both called for a body called the supreme court
What governmental body is responsible for interpreting the Constitution?
The federal courts of the Judicial Branch are responsible for interpreting the US Constitution. The Supreme Court of the United States (also commonly called the US Supreme Court), head of the Judicial branch of government, is the highest authority on constitutional interpretation.A. Supreme Court
What is this body called?
Supreme court?
What body makes the final interpretation of what the constitution means?
supreme court
The government body responsible for interpreting the Constitution is the?
supreme courtThe government body responsible for interpreting the United States Constitution is the federal courts of the Judicial Branch.
What is the Supreme court case on separation of Church and State?
There is not just one Supreme Court case on this; there is a whole body of jurisprudence on interpreting the "Establishment Clause" in First Amendment of the US Constitution.
The Supreme Court is not so much a court of justice as the US ultimate lawmaking body?
The purpose of the Supreme Court of the United States is not necessarily to dispense justice. Its purpose is to interpret law as it pertains to the US Constitution.
What is the only court or legislative body that can overrule the supreme court?
Congress, is the only legislative body that can overrule the Supreme Court.
Who or which body has the authority to decide if a law passed by Congress is allowed under the Constitution of the US?
The Supreme Court Of The United States.
What section of the Constitution provided for abortions by women?
The bill of rights is interpreted by the US Supreme Court to include the woman's right to her body.
Is the US Supreme Court the law of the land?
Answer Yes, when you argue a case in court you have to cite legal precedents. The Constitution and the laws passed by Congress along with the interpretations of those laws by the Court (all Courts, not just the Supreme Court) constitute the law. When courts disagree or a decision is appealed to a court the decision of the highest court becomes the new standard. The Supreme Court is the highest standard. Answer Yes and no. Usually the "Supreme Law of the Land" refers to the Constitution of the United States. According to Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution, however, the "Supreme Law of the Land" means "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof." We usually take this to mean enacted laws, or laws made by a legislative body, like Congress, but it can also mean common law, or laws made as a result of judicial decisions. Supreme Court decisions make common law, which is enforceable and carries the rule of law, so it must also be in compliance with the Constitution. In that sense, rulings by the Supreme Court could be considered part of the "Supreme Law of the Land," as long as they are constitutionally sound. Article VI, Section 2 (Supremacy Clause) This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Should the US Supreme Court should be the final arbiter of the meaning of the Constitution?
Yes, the US Supreme Court should be the final arbiter of the meaning of the Constitution. As the highest court in the land, it is responsible for interpreting and applying the Constitution to legal disputes. Its role as the final authority ensures consistency in constitutional interpretation across the country and helps maintain the balance of power among the three branches of government.
