0
My reading of Tacitus does not mentioned Jesus the man, but about Christians as a group . see http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/tacitus.html
Actually he does mention Christ, only in passing though, this is what he says,
Book 15, Chapter 44 of his book: Annals.
Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind. Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired.
The christians were blamed for the great fire of Rome in A.D. 64.
This is probably the link you are looking for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Jesus
Book 15 of the Annals (c. 116) by the Roman historian Tacitus mentions Christus as a person convicted by Pontius Pilate during Tiberius' reign:
:: auctor nominis eius Christus Tiberio imperitante per procuratorem Pontium Pilatum supplicio adfectus erat (Annales 15.44)The passage is part of an account of the Great Fire of Rome (64), which emperor Nero blamed on a religious group called Chrestians or Christians, and offers an etymology for the group's name. This has become one of the best known and most discussed passages of Tacitus' works
1. It is not quoted by the Christian fathers.
2. Tertullian was familiar with the writings of Tacitus, and his arguments demanded the citation of this evidence had it existed.
3. Clement of Alexandria, at the beginning of the third century, made a compilation of all the recognitions of Christ and Christianity that had been made by Pagan writers up to his time. The writings of Tacitus furnished no recognition of them.
4. Origen, in his controversy with Celsus, would undoubtedly have used it had it existed.
5. The ecclesiastical historian Eusebius, in the fourth century, cites all the evidences of Christianity obtainable from Jewish and Pagan sources, but makes no mention of Tacitus.
6. It is not quoted by any Christian writer prior to the fifteenth century.
7. At this time but one copy of the Annals existed and this copy, it is claimed, was made in the eighth century -- 600 years after the time of Tacitus.
8. As this single copy was in the possession of a Christian the insertion of a forgery was easy.
9. Its severe criticisms of Christianity do not necessarily disprove its Christian origin. No ancient witness was more desirable than Tacitus, but his introduction at so late a period would make rejection certain unless Christian forgery could be made to appear improbable.
10. It is admitted by Christian writers that the works of Tacitus have not been preserved with any considerable degree of fidelity. In the writings ascribed to him are believed to be some of the writings of Quintilian.
11. The blood-curdling story about the frightful orgies of Nero reads like some Christian romance of the dark ages, and not like Tacitus.
12. In fact, this story, in nearly the same words, omitting the reference to Christ, is to be found in the writings of Sulpicius Severus, a Christian of the fifth century.
13. Suetonius, while mercilessly condemning the reign of Nero, says that in his public entertainments he took particular care that no human lives should be sacrificed, "not even those of condemned criminals."
14. At the time that the conflagration occurred, Tacitus himself declares that Nero was not in Rome, but at Antium.
Many who accept the authenticity of this section of the "Annals" believe that the sentence which declares that Christ was punished in the reign of Pontius Pilate is an interpolation. This sentence bears the unmistakable stamp of Christian forgery. It interrupts the narrative; it disconnects two closely related statements. Eliminate this sentence, and there is no break in the narrative.
In all the Roman records there was no evidence that Christ was put to death by Pontius Pilate. This sentence, if genuine, is the most important evidence in Pagan literature. That it existed in the works of the greatest and best known of Roman historians, and was ignored or overlooked by Christian apologists for 1,360 years, no intelligent critic can believe.
Tacitus did not write this sentence.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Roman historian who wrote about Agricola?
Tacitus
What did the ancient Roman historian Tacitus write about the Germanic Tribes?
Tacitus wrote "Germania" .
Historian who wrote Annals?
tacitus
When did the name Germania first appear?
It was the name given to the area by Tacitus, the Roman historian when he wrote about it in AD 98.
What historian wrote Annals?
'Annals' was written by Tacitus .
What ancient Roman historian describes in great detail the death of Seneca?
Tacitus wrote the account of Seneca's suicide-farewell party.
Who is tacitus?
Tacitus was the son-in-law of Gnaeus Julius Agricola, he was a Pivotal roman historian who made several writings and provided valuble information on the ancient Germanic peoples and Caledonian/ancient scottish people. he is probably most famous for his book "The agricola" which provides insight on the roman invasion of scotland by his father-in-law, Gnaeus julius Agricola, he also wrote information and observations on the culture of the picts and caledonians and their agriculture and military life. and also provides the only existing account on the battle of mons Graupius between the romans and the Caledonians.
When was the first written account of the Germans?
This may not be the earliest written account of Germanic peoples, but the Roman historian Tacitus wrote "Germania" in c. 98 AD, an ethnographic book about the Germanic tribes which roamed the land north of the Roman Empire.
5 famous historians and give their contributions?
Here are some Classical historians for you: Thucydides: Ancient Greek Historian who informed us of the Peloponnesian Warbetween Sparta and Athens, and the life and times of the famous Pericles. Herodotus: The Father of History. Ancient Greek writer who travelled extensively and informed us of geography and politics of the time. Tacitus: Roman Historian who wrote on the Emperors of the early Principate, their activities against Germany and his father in law Agricola who was commander of the legions in Britain. He tells us much of the Emperor's, their policies and is often our only source in regards to the early Britons. Arrian: History of Alexander the Great. Wrote on his conquests, life, politics and influences. Best informant we have on the young king. Suetonius: Roman Historian/Biographer who wrote The Lives of Twelve Caesars, about the early principate. Unlike Tacitus, Suetonius wasn't so much a historian but a purveyor of juicy gossip. Fun to read. Plutarch: Parallel lives, comparing the lives of famous Greeks and Romans, which linked them according to their achievements, personalities and the way in which they were viewed by their contemporaries. Cassius Dio: A Greek Roman historian. Wrote on Alexander and Roman History.
Who did Tacitus write for?
AnswerTacitus was an early second century Roman historian. Not a great deal is known about him, but he seems to have had republican inclinations. His writings about the early Roman Emperors always seemed biased to highlight their worst characteristics. He had a successful political career and probably did not need a patron to support him while he wrote his Annals and Histories, etc.
Where did tacitus write?
He wrote in Rome
Who wrote Roman histories?
It seems like any retired official who had access to a pen and papyrus wrote a history of some kind. These range from biographies to personal memoirs. However the main historians of ancient Rome were Livy, Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio and Appian. Cicero can also be loosely considered a historian because of his personal letters that have survived.
