There are scientific laws and theories in which recorded and observable data indicate are true. But sometimes new findings come along, which can throw a wrench into things until information is sorted out and a greater understanding evolves.
Yes and no.
More often than not a scientific fact is refined.
Take the value of pi. for centuries 3 was good enough for all practical applications, then it was 3.1, then 3.14159 and on and on.
For two or three centuries Newtonian physics was considered the rule, then along came Einstein and inserted the refinement of relativity.
it depends on the scientist
No it is false scintific facts do change
false
yes because we always find something new
false
True.
Learning in the natural world does not start with memorizing scientific laws and theories. It starts with the child exploring those facts while playing.
false
false
false
True.
false
Yes, strong arguments can be based on false premises, made-up "facts," iffy scientific "evidence," etc. It is actually fairly common.
You write out a bunch of facts. Then change some of them to be false and mix them in with the true ones so the students can pick if each statement is true or false.
true
Although it is proven and true, there is a .00001% that is could be false. So therefore it can't be a scientific law. That makes it a theory. There are very few scientific laws and only obvious facts are scientific laws. Like gravity.
Learning in the natural world does not start with memorizing scientific laws and theories. It starts with the child exploring those facts while playing.
Yes, they place false facts on cigarrettes. Yes, they place false facts on cigarrettes.
false
false
false