Does literature consist entirely of masterpieces?

Answer

Of course not. There are as many horribly written books (maybe lots more) in literature as there are well-written "classics." I suppose it partially depends on your definition of masterpiece, but literature is everything that anyone published at any point... in whatever language, of whatever quality. And, believe me, there is a LOT of junk that gets published.

To illustrate, walk through a bookstore sometime, and instead of heading straight for the section where you usually shop, or that appeals to you, start browsing other sections. I guarantee that you will find several books that you would never, ever read even if they were the last books on Earth. There is an awful lot of good stuff as well... but just like television with a b'zillion channels, you have to pick and choose to find what is good. Just because someone puts it on TV doesn't make it good. Same with books.

Improve Answer Discuss the question "Does literature consist entirely of masterpieces?" Watch Question

First answer by Zanbabe. Last edit by Zanbabe. Contributor trust: 402 [recommend contributor]. Question popularity: 14 [recommend question]

Research your answer:

Answers.com > Wiki Answers > Categories > Literature and Language > Books and Literature > Does literature consist entirely of masterpieces?

Our contributors said this page should be displayed for the questions below. (Where do these come from)
If any of these are not a genuine rephrasing of the question, please help out and edit these alternates.
Masterpieces in india?  What are the standards of a masterpiece?  Does literature consist entirely of a masterpieces?  Is literature cannot consist entirely of a masterpiece?