Want this question answered?
a collection of evidence assembled to support a point of view
Evidence Collection
DNA evidence can help convict criminals or show that an accused person is innocent.
No he is single... No evidence to suggest he does from any media source. No public portrayal of a relationship.
Statistical evidence is a set or collection of numbers that prove a theory or story to be true.
a sysrem or collection of such ruls
DNA evidence is very conclusive and some say 99% accurate, however it is possible to challenge it based upon faulty collection and/or faulty lab techniques. All evidence can be contaminated by faulty collection and preservation methods and it leaves the evidence open to challenge. One key component to preserving any evidence is maintaining a secure chain of custody of any collected evidence. from the time of collection to the end of the case in court every movement of the evidence must be documented.
the 1978 supreme court case that related to the impropriety of the warrantless collection of physical evidence at a homicide scene is ?
Digital Forensics
There is no "probable cause clause" attached to the collection of evidence. EVIDENCE of a crime can be collected at any time law enforcement beomes aware of the offense. Evidence, once collected, is developed and used by the investigators, and can lead to the establishment of "probable cause" to charge a particular individual. Under a more technical view of evidence collection - sometimes a warrant may have to be applied for in order to look for and gather evidence and a judge would have to be persuaded that 'probable cause' existed to enter a premises or take blood samples, etc.
argument (apex)The theme
It refers to the collection and documentation of all evidence at a crime scene