There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question as it depends on the individual circumstances and dynamics within the family. Some parents may reconsider their decision and take their grown children back in the case of divorce or death, while others may maintain their disownment. Ultimately, it varies from family to family and depends on the parents' willingness to reconcile and the dynamics at play.

In the case of Loving v. Virginia, the concurring opinion was written by Justice Potter Stewart. He agreed with the majority's ruling that Virginia's anti-miscegenation law was unconstitutional but wrote a separate concurrence to emphasize that the freedom to marry was a fundamental right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. He argued that the Constitution prohibits interracial marriage restrictions just as it forbids measures that discriminate based on race.

Yes, interracial marriage is allowed and legally recognized in New Hampshire. The state has no restrictions on marriage based on race or ethnicity.

Yes, interracial marriage and interracial sexual activity were illegal and strictly prohibited under the policy of apartheid in South Africa. The Immorality Act of 1950 specifically criminalized interracial sexual relations and marriage between different racial groups. Violators of these laws could face heavy penalties, including imprisonment.

The first US law against miscegenation, or interracial marriage, appeared in the state of Maryland in 1664. It prohibited marriages between English women and African men. This law was followed by similar laws in other colonies, which remained in place until the 20th century.

What was the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia

In many cases it was death. The KKK would come in the night and hang the person who they felt had “overstepped “. In the most minor case a fine was levied. Rosa Parks was arrested and fined five dollars.

This depends on the person. But, Islamically speaking, interracial marriage is allowed, and racism is highly discouraged. When Muslims stand to pray to God, race is insignificant in his eyes, as what is important is the amount of faith one has.

God (Allah in Arabic) says in the Holy Qur'an 49:13: "O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another."

This shows that God encourages us to mix races and not to view it as a boundary for segregation and enmity, but as something unique each person has.

________________________________________________

Additional point:

The above answer is absolutely correct. In addition to the above, the only condition; per Islam teachings; is that a Muslim man can marry only who is Muslim, Christian, or Jewish. A Muslim woman can marry only a Muslim man.

The simple answer is that there are different races, and people of different races have sex.

Miscegenation (Latin miscere "to mix" + genus "kind") is the mixing of different racial groups, that is, marrying, cohabiting, having sexual relations and having children with a partner from outside one's racially or ethnically defined group.

In the United States Miscegentation laws were laws that banned interracial marriage and sometimes sex between members of two different races and were enforced in the Thirteen Colonies from the late seventeenth century onwards, and subsequently in several US states and US territories until 1967.

The laws were gradually repealed state-by-state during the period 1948-1967, however, the southern slave states were notoriously slow and some of these states waited till 1998 to fix language in their constitutions.

Similar laws were also enforced in Nazi Germany, from 1935 until 1945, and in South Africa during the Apartheid era, from 1948 until 1984.


The history of these laws is complex and lengthy. See the related link for a more complete discussion.

Yes. Both from a social aspect and a spiritual aspect.

as long as you love the other person i don't see anything wrong with it and shouldn't really care what other peeps think.

The bible is not against interracial marriages. Moses' wife Zipporah was a Cushite. Cush was an ancient African empire whose inhabitants were black. In Numbers 12 God smote Moses' brother and sister with leprosy because they criticized the fact that his wife was black. Reason for this is the possibility that interracial marriage will make the followers of the Bible god to convert to the gods of the other race. Read Exodus 34:10-16. Deuteronomy 7:1-6 & 2 Corinthians 7:39 The question is a false and leading question in that it assumes something quite false. The Bible is not against interracial marriage but it is against a Christian marrying a non-Christian.

The issue of loss of faith is a real issue but this has nothing whatsoever to do with race since people of all races are Christian believers.

If a person of the same race or a different race is not a Christian then the New Testament certainly forbids the marriage. The Old Testament principle is essentially the same. The people of the Canaanites were pagan idolaters of the most vile kind. If they were around today, many of them would be locked up for their bestiality and child-sacrifices. Both Ruth the Moabite and Rahab the inhabitant of Jericho were taken in by the Israelites and Ruth is in the family line of Jesus Christ through her marriage to Boaz.

Thus it is, as always good to understand what the Bible is actually saying and to read it in context.

no country

1967.

There were many facets of this. Before slavery came to the US, interracial relationships were illegal in the colonies, though miscegenation didn't even exist as a word. Once slavery was practiced, laws against interracial relationships were used to help prevent slave uprisings and to divide people into two groups, making it easy to tell the slaves from the free. Then there were the religious beliefs and the racism.

Yes, several times with Billy Dee.

Overall, the affects would be the same as with any other marriage. There would be a few additional challenges depending on the couple and where they live. If they live where it is unpopular, they could both face persecution, or at the least, be isolated and shunned. There are not too many places like that anymore. If they didn't grow up around each other' cultures, they would have to expand their understanding of cultural practices and norms. There would be some minor differences like learning how another race cares for their hair, since the products used and the methods are different.

There could be occasional clashes, but that would be more from social class and upbringing, not the race itself. If someone with low income values and middle class values come together, or for that matter, people of different local cultures ("Redneck," "Yankee," "Cajun," "Bourgeois," etc), there could be occasional misunderstandings. That would because of cultures and class groups, not races. However, different races may be more likely to represent different cultures and classes, but not always.

So the affects should be the same overall as with most couples, but with variations per exact couple.

1946

Loving v. Virginia

I think interracial marriage is just as okay as any old marriage I also think that anyone who thinks that it is wrong needs to wake up cause its the 21 century Color is just a color...it cant choose who you are or who your are going to marry

"Miscegenation" refers to the mixing of people of different races. This mixing could include marriage or cohabitation, sexual relations, or procreation.