answersLogoWhite

0

🤝

US Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the land. Questions about the US Supreme Court and the highest US State courts of appeal, as well as questions of relevant case law, Court opinions, and historical issues related to this venue are among the questions asked in our US Supreme Court category.

500 Questions

What did the US Supreme Court decide about President Obama's birth certificate and citizenship?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The US Supreme Court did not make any decisions regarding President Obama's birth certificate and citizenship. Multiple courts and investigations confirmed that President Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born citizen of the United States.

Which issue was at the heart of New York Times versus US?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The issue at the heart of New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) was whether the government could prevent a newspaper from publishing classified information (Pentagon Papers) under the First Amendment's protection of freedom of the press. The case raised questions about prior restraint and the balance between national security interests and the public's right to know.

What rules of law applied in Hustler Magazine v Falwell?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

In the case of Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protected a satirical advertisement published in Hustler magazine, which was considered offensive by Reverend Jerry Falwell. The court held that public figures could not recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress without showing that the publication contained a false statement made with actual malice. This case reaffirmed the importance of protecting freedom of speech and the press, even when the speech is offensive or distasteful.

Who authored the US Supreme Court's majority opinion in Hustler Magazine v Falwell?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Justice William Rehnquist authored the majority opinion in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, a landmark 1988 case. The Court ruled in favor of Hustler Magazine, holding that the First Amendment protected the publication's parody of the reverend Jerry Falwell.

How does the decision of Hustler Magazine v. Falwell affect us today?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Supreme Court ruling in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell in 1988 established that public figures cannot recover damages for emotional distress based on satire and parody. This decision continues to impact free speech protections in the media and limits the ability of public figures to sue for defamation or invasion of privacy in cases where satire or parody is involved.

What principle did New York Times v US overturn?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

New York Times Co. v. United States overturned the principle of prior restraint, which prevented the government from censoring or prohibiting publications before they were distributed. The case reaffirmed the importance of protecting freedom of the press and the ability to publish information critical of the government.

What were the constitutional issues in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 1988?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The main constitutional issue in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988) was whether a public figure could recover damages for emotional distress caused by a parody advertisement in a magazine. The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment protected the magazine's right to satirize public figures, even if the parody was deemed offensive, as long as it could not reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts.

What is the impact of New York Times v united state?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The impact of New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) was to establish a high bar for government censorship on matters of national security. The Supreme Court ruling affirmed the importance of a free press in holding government accountable and set a precedent for protecting the First Amendment rights of journalists. This case is often cited in discussions about press freedom and government secrecy.

How did the Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co v Sullivan affect freedom of the press?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co v Sullivan strengthened freedom of the press by setting higher standards for public figures to prove defamation. It established the "actual malice" standard, requiring proof that a statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for the truth for defamation claims involving public officials. This decision allowed the press more freedom to report on public officials without fear of crippling lawsuits.

Why did Jerry Falwell take Larry Flynt to court?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Jerry Falwell took Larry Flynt to court because he believed that Flynt's publication, Hustler magazine, had defamed his character by publishing a parody that suggested Falwell had engaged in a drunken incestuous encounter with his mother. Falwell sued Flynt for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy.

Did Hustler Magazine v. Falwell overturn New York Times v. Sullivan?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

No, Hustler Magazine v. Falwell did not overturn New York Times v. Sullivan. New York Times v. Sullivan established the actual malice standard for defamation of public figures, while Hustler v. Falwell dealt with intentional infliction of emotional distress in a case involving a public figure.

What was the Supreme Court case New York Times v United States about?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

New York Times v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1971 that dealt with the publication of the Pentagon Papers, a classified government study on the Vietnam War. The case tested the limits of prior restraint and freedom of the press, ultimately ruling in favor of the New York Times and allowing them to continue publishing the papers. The case reaffirmed the importance of a free press in holding the government accountable.

What do the Supreme Court decisions described in this timeline have in common?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

They center on freedom of speech. Apex 4.2.4

Is Justice a problem play of john Galsworthy?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The character in 'justice' were very much fundamental to the real life person 's character just like cokeson , falder , ruth , william , john .

Who has the power to establish courts?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Article 1,Section 8,Clause 9 gives congress the enumerated power to Establish Tribunals. Thus giving them the power to establish our country's courts.

Are members in the supreme court elected or appointed?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Members of the Supreme Court in the United States are appointed, not elected. The President nominates candidates, and the Senate confirms or rejects the nomination. Once confirmed, justices serve for life or until they retire.

How do you think the US might be different today if the Supreme court had not applied to the process of incorporation to the Due Process Clause?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

If the Supreme Court had not applied the process of incorporation to the Due Process Clause, it's likely that certain provisions in the Bill of Rights would only apply to the federal government, and not to state governments. This would result in uneven protection of individual rights across the country, potentially leading to a patchwork of laws and regulations depending on the state. Additionally, it could limit the ability of individuals to seek redress for violations of these rights at the state level.

What was the significance of the judicial review established by the Supreme Court under John Marshall?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The establishment of judicial review by the Supreme Court under John Marshall was significant because it asserted the court's power to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of laws. This decision in Marbury v. Madison solidified the court's role as the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution and established the principle of judicial supremacy, giving the court a check on the other branches of government. It greatly expanded the power and influence of the Supreme Court in shaping the interpretation of the Constitution.

Is it true that The US Supreme Court has a long history of expressing a strong preference for the use of a search warrant?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

Yes, it is true that the US Supreme Court has consistently expressed a strong preference for the use of search warrants. This preference is based on the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court has held that a warrant is generally required for searches and seizures, except for certain exceptions recognized by the Court.

How many terms can you serve for in the supreme court?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

US Supreme Court Justices have no "terms". According to the US Constitution they serve "during Good Behavior", which basically means "for life, or at least until they decide to step down or get caught doing something truly outrageously illegal and are officially removed from office."

No Justice has ever been impeached.

The duty of the Supreme Court is to what laws?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The duty of the Supreme Court is to interpret and apply laws. They review cases and determine whether laws or actions are constitutional or not. When there are disputes or conflicts involving the interpretation or application of laws, the Supreme Court has the final authority to decide on them.

How does the US Supreme Court decide what cases to hear and what happens during the hearing?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The US Supreme Court exercises discretion in selecting cases it wants to hear. Generally, it considers cases that involve important constitutional questions, conflicting rulings from lower courts, or cases of significant national importance. During the hearing, each side presents oral arguments to the justices, who typically ask questions and engage in a rigorous discussion. The justices then meet privately to deliberate and make a decision, which is expressed through a written opinion.

When did Justice at Large end?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

There is no specific end date for Justice at Large as it is a concept and not a specific event or timeline. Justice at Large refers to the idea and commitment to promoting justice on a global scale. It is an ongoing pursuit that continues to be important and relevant in various global contexts.

Where can I find the text of Clarence Thomas' dissenting opinion on cross burning?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

You can find the text of Clarence Thomas' dissenting opinion on cross burning in the Supreme Court case Virginia v. Black (2003) on the official website of the Supreme Court of the United States. It is available in the Court's opinions archive. Additionally, various legal research databases and academic websites may also have the text available for reading or downloading.

Why did the Supreme Court overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966?

User Avatar

Asked by Wiki User

The Supreme Court overturned the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because his confession had been obtained without informing him of his right to remain silent and his right to have an attorney present during questioning. The court held that this violated his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. This landmark case led to the creation of the Miranda rights, which law enforcement must now recite to suspects upon arrest.