0
'Fallacy of Assumption' describes a class of formal and informal logical fallacies that are to do with a flaw in an argument's assumptions.
A common example of a fallacy of assumption (there are others) is when someone assumes the very thing they are trying to prove. This is commonly known as begging the question, or petitio principii.
The nature of this fallacy is obvious in the following form:
P1: Fairies Exist
Therefore
C2: Fairies Exist
It's clear that the form of the argument above could be used to 'prove' anything.
As the argument becomes increasingly elaborate, it becomes easier to miss the fallacy.
P1: Fairies Exist
P2: Only fairies can make gardens that are extremely beautiful
P3: My garden is extremely beautiful
Therefore (from P1, P2 and P3)
C1: My garden was made extremely beautiful by fairies
Therefore (from C1)
C2: Fairies Exist
Arguments that commit a fallacy of assumption can easily hide the fallacy by rendering it implicit. This means making a premise in the argument that implies the fallacious assumption without explicitly stating it. In the example immediately above, the statement that 'only fairies can make gardens extremely beautiful' has the assumption that fairies exist built into it. Because of this, P1 can be furtively omitted, giving the logical form below.
P1: Only fairies can make gardens that are extremely beautiful
P2: My garden is extremely beautiful
Therefore (from P1 and P2)
C1: My garden was made extremely beautiful by fairies
Therefore (from C1)
C2: Fairies exist
This argument could be delivered in speech in something like the following manner:
My garden is extremely beautiful. Sure, I work at it. But no one can make a garden this beautiful - no one human, anyway. Only fairies could have done it! I know that fairies had to have made my garden so beautiful, and that's how I know that fairies really exist.
The example may seem silly given the subject matter is fairies. However, arguments of a similar form are very common for other ideas.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is fallacy circular reasoning?
What is fallacy circular reasoning?
What is an ad hominem?
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
What if an argument does not commit a fallacy?
If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it does not necessarily mean that the argument is sound. A fallacy is an argument that uses poor reasoning.
The fallacy of irrelevant reason is sometimes called?
The red herring fallacy
Why is the Code of Kalantiaw a fallacy?
yes it was a fallacy coz there was no factual evidence.
How would you use assumption in a sentence?
The assumption that all pies taste good is a societal fallacy.
What is fallacy of consumption and assumption to be causation problems in economics?
Fallacy of consumption is when you assume that all men are endowed with huge cocks ;-p <---------------8
Which logical fallacy makes the assumption that youre trying to prove is a fact?
begging the question.
What is the suffix of fallacy?
fallacy(period)
What part of speech is fallacy?
Fallacy is a noun.
Can anyone give an example of a fallacy?
A fallacy is a statement that is in error or not correct. "The earth is flat" is a fallacy.
A fallacy is basically an?
A fallacy is basically an error in reasoning.
What is fallacy of positive instances?
fallacy of positive instances
What is fallacy circular reasoning?
What is fallacy circular reasoning?
What is an ad hominem?
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
What is Ad hominem?
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
What is a adhominen genetic fallacy?
What is a ad hominem genetic fallacy?
