Want this question answered?
[object Object]
The stereotype that black people are dumb, lazy, or subhuman are often used to justify slavery. We force non-human animals to do physical labor in unkind conditions, so all one needs to do is classify a group as non-human or otherwise lesser, and the rules are bent, and morality overridden.
The outcome of actions. Utilitarianism comes so perilously close to the Machiavellian idea that the means justify the end, it is hard to accept as an ideal ethical or moral philosophy. The major problem with utilitarianism is that by waiting for the out come of ones action, that person doesn't have any reliable standard by which to decide what is good or bad and can only wait and see. This can mean a lot of apologizing and cleaning up messes afterward. It is somewhat like gambling with ethics, a moral lottery ticket, that if in the end turns out all right, then jackpot!, if not, oh well, better luck next time. Morality and ethics is not the realm of lucky people, it is the field of those who have endeavored to take responsibility for their own actions, the actions of others, and for those unforeseen events that require responsibility be taken. Hardly a game for people who rely on luck.
If you are the other woman you should be ashamed of yourself. You are a woman of poor character and judgement. You are self centered and selfish. You are careless and immature. You have no moral compass and try to justify your behavior. Find strength to do the right thing and stop being the other woman. Have enough self respect for yourself to stop interfering in another womans marriage - regardless of the state of that union. For goodness sake...grow up and be responsible.
An intrapsychic conflict refers to a conflict between the players of the psyche, namely the id, ego, and superego. This conflict is a direct result of a behavior that doesn't justify one's beliefs. For instance, someone who believes that adultery is immoral and falls prey to this immoral act may develop an intrapsychic conflict. The id being pro-act, superego opponent to such act, and a resulting weak ego that is unable to resolve this conflict.
A number leaves reminder 6 when divided by 10. What is the remainder when the number is divided by 5? Justify your reasoning.
reasoning
Gods (any) do not justify their decisions to mortals.
"Decision Points" is George W. Bush's memoir that provides a firsthand account of key decisions and moments during his presidency. The book covers a range of topics such as the 9/11 attacks, the Iraq War, Hurricane Katrina, and the financial crisis, offering insight into his thought processes and decision-making framework. It aims to provide context and explanation for his actions while in office.
It used intelligence to justify decisions already made.
do 43+57 which is 100 then do 100+68 which is 168 the answer is 168
It means that even if what you are aiming for in the long run is a positive thing, using negative methods to do it is not justifiable. Hope this helps!
businesses think that being morally correct is enough
You cannot call ethical anything done in war but you can justify actions done to the enemy but again no war action is ethical. Bombing an area will always bring civilians corpses so bombing an area is ethical by no means but some people could accept the terms which the bombs were dropped in the first place.
It used intelligence to justify decisions already made.
A religious radical will based their erratic decisions based on their theology. They will then use their beliefs to justify their actions. Ethnic radicals will based their action based on history.
The Bush Administration made the mistake of using intelligence to justify decisions already made.