answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How can you use ethical reasoning to evaluate and justify the decisions you make?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology

What may be development for one may not be development for the others justify the statement with suitable examples?

[object Object]


How are stereotypes used to justify slavery?

The stereotype that black people are dumb, lazy, or subhuman are often used to justify slavery. We force non-human animals to do physical labor in unkind conditions, so all one needs to do is classify a group as non-human or otherwise lesser, and the rules are bent, and morality overridden.


Utilitarianism is a moral theory that focuses mainly on?

The outcome of actions. Utilitarianism comes so perilously close to the Machiavellian idea that the means justify the end, it is hard to accept as an ideal ethical or moral philosophy. The major problem with utilitarianism is that by waiting for the out come of ones action, that person doesn't have any reliable standard by which to decide what is good or bad and can only wait and see. This can mean a lot of apologizing and cleaning up messes afterward. It is somewhat like gambling with ethics, a moral lottery ticket, that if in the end turns out all right, then jackpot!, if not, oh well, better luck next time. Morality and ethics is not the realm of lucky people, it is the field of those who have endeavored to take responsibility for their own actions, the actions of others, and for those unforeseen events that require responsibility be taken. Hardly a game for people who rely on luck.


How to behave if you are the other woman?

If you are the other woman you should be ashamed of yourself. You are a woman of poor character and judgement. You are self centered and selfish. You are careless and immature. You have no moral compass and try to justify your behavior. Find strength to do the right thing and stop being the other woman. Have enough self respect for yourself to stop interfering in another womans marriage - regardless of the state of that union. For goodness sake...grow up and be responsible.


What is an intrapsychic conflict?

An intrapsychic conflict refers to a conflict between the players of the psyche, namely the id, ego, and superego. This conflict is a direct result of a behavior that doesn't justify one's beliefs. For instance, someone who believes that adultery is immoral and falls prey to this immoral act may develop an intrapsychic conflict. The id being pro-act, superego opponent to such act, and a resulting weak ego that is unable to resolve this conflict.

Related questions

What is A number that leaves a remainder of 6 when divided by 10 What is the remainder when the number is divided by 5 Justify your reasoning?

A number leaves reminder 6 when divided by 10. What is the remainder when the number is divided by 5? Justify your reasoning.


Which cognitive skill in critical thinking relates to the following statement They justify their reasoning in terms of the facts assumptions and criteria upon which their results were based?

reasoning


How did Zeus decide who the gods stood for?

Gods (any) do not justify their decisions to mortals.


What is former US president George W Bush's book 'Decision Points' about?

"Decision Points" is George W. Bush's memoir that provides a firsthand account of key decisions and moments during his presidency. The book covers a range of topics such as the 9/11 attacks, the Iraq War, Hurricane Katrina, and the financial crisis, offering insight into his thought processes and decision-making framework. It aims to provide context and explanation for his actions while in office.


What policy cycle mistake did the Bush administration make?

It used intelligence to justify decisions already made.


How do you evaluate expression 43 plus 68 plus 57 and justify with each step?

do 43+57 which is 100 then do 100+68 which is 168 the answer is 168


What is meant by the ethical principle that the end does not justify the means?

It means that even if what you are aiming for in the long run is a positive thing, using negative methods to do it is not justifiable. Hope this helps!


Explain the difficulties associated with telling businesses that its ethical responsibilities end with obedience to the law Justify your response with a related example?

businesses think that being morally correct is enough


Was the use of the carpet-bombing against your enemies in World War 2 necessary?

You cannot call ethical anything done in war but you can justify actions done to the enemy but again no war action is ethical. Bombing an area will always bring civilians corpses so bombing an area is ethical by no means but some people could accept the terms which the bombs were dropped in the first place.


According to Professor Pillars article about the war in Iraq what policy cycle mistake did the Bush administration make?

It used intelligence to justify decisions already made.


How are religious and ethnic radicals dissimilar?

A religious radical will based their erratic decisions based on their theology. They will then use their beliefs to justify their actions. Ethnic radicals will based their action based on history.


According to Professor Pillar's article about the war in Iraq what policy cycle mistake did the Bush administration make?

The Bush Administration made the mistake of using intelligence to justify decisions already made.