They would have to have different base velocities. One on the ground, the other in a moving vehicle.
It depends on the observer's frame of reference. If both are stationary then an object's speed will be measured to be the same. If one or both are moving at unequal velocities, then the same object will appear to move at a different speed for each observer.
Elastic collision: objects bound against each other after the collision. - One is moving and the other is at rest. - Both objects are moving. Inelastic collision: objects stick together after the collision. - One is moving and the other is at rest. - Both objects are moving.
It applies to both moving and non-moving objects.
That simply means that there is NO WAY to define or measure an "absolute motion".Any experiment you do will be the SAME for different observers - in the sense that it is unaffected by relative velocities.
In the absence of air, all objects fall with the same acceleration. That means that at the same time after the drop, all objects are moving at the same speed.
The two observers would each measure light to be the same. The speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their frames of reference.
inertia
It depends on the observer's frame of reference. If both are stationary then an object's speed will be measured to be the same. If one or both are moving at unequal velocities, then the same object will appear to move at a different speed for each observer.
The product does not make any sensible measure.
There is no "A inertia." Its just inertia and inertia is the measure of an objects to stay at rest or to keep moving.
Elastic collision: objects bound against each other after the collision. - One is moving and the other is at rest. - Both objects are moving. Inelastic collision: objects stick together after the collision. - One is moving and the other is at rest. - Both objects are moving.
yes moving objects have impulse
keep distance with moving objects.
All moving objects have Momentum.
Objects moving toward you will have a blue shift in their spectrum and objects moving away from you will have a red shift in their spectrum. This is known as a doppler shift.
It applies to both moving and non-moving objects.
In a short answer, no. There are no known examples of time moving backwards, and no scientific theories supporting the organized reversal of time. Einstein's theory of relativity predicts time can progress at different rates for different observers, depending upon the differential relativistic speed of the observers, and this difference in the progression time has been confirmed experimentally. But even in those confirmed cases, time always moves forwards for all observers, it just moves forwards faster for some observers than for others.