Perhaps because a four square mile park built on ashes and rubble in the center of the city seemed to be a poor real estate investment at the time. It is also an American tradition when given Lemons to make Lemonade. It was a chance to make a new start while correcting the errors of the past decades of urban planning.
One brick at a time, just like any other rebuild in America!
No. The Great Chicago Fire caused the need for the city to rebuild.
Europe
They rebuild with brick and made Chicago a better place to live and safe
At the time of the Great Chicago Fire (1871), there was no Macy's in Chicago. Macy's acquired Marshall Field & Company in August of 2005.
Daniel Burnham created the master plan to rebuild Chicago after the fire
Mears Michigan
The Chicago Fire changed Chicago forever. Because so many buildings were gone, Chicago was able to widen streets and build more modern buildings. Chicago wanted to rebuild a grand city and many architects came here to build notable buildings.
Check out this site: http:/www.chicagohs.org/fire Try making this a link or give a little better answer .
No, an insurance company can not force you to rebuild your house after a fire. They can tell you how much they are willing to offer you for the damage on your home. At that point you can decide whether to rebuild or move.
The Chicago Fire is a Major League Soccer club in Chicago.
It depends on what you mean by "recover." In some ways it was vastly better than before the fire within 2-3 years. It was probably closer to 10 years before the vast majority of lots were rebuilt, though.
One brick at a time, just like any other rebuild in America!