answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Hamilton thought that iy was good but had some flaws and jefferson thought it wasnt a good idea at first

User Avatar

Henriette Pagac

Lvl 13
1y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

The Federalists believed that the federal government had certain implied powers that were not laid out in the Constitution while the Jeffersonian Republicans believed that government did not have the power to do anything that was not granted in the document.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Republicans wanted to keep most power at the state or local level. They feared that a strong government would act like a monarchy.

Federalists said the United States needed a strong federal government to hold the country together and deal with its problems.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the Federalists and Republicans interpret the Constitution differently?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about U.S. History

How did the Marshall Court interpret the Constitution?

The principle of judicial review.


It can be difficult to read and interpret primary historical documents for several different reasons Why is it difficult to read and correctly interpret the Mayflower Compact and all of its meanings?

It is difficult to read and correctly interpret because it was so influenced by the historical events that happened just before it was written.


What are four ways of interpreting the constitution?

The first is Literalism, which insists upon a strict interpretation of the actual words used in the Constitution. The second is the Intent of the Framers, another technique that seeks to explain what the Framers at the time were trying to achieve in writing the constitution. The third is the Balancing of Interests, which is a technique that helps balance the Individualism and the Communitarian specter of the Constitution. The fourth and last one is the Stare Decesis, Latin for previous decision stands, is another technique of interpretation that remains useful in that the judge looks for precedents which resemble current controversy, finds the rule of law that was used in those cases, and applies it to the present case. In short, it is referring to the previous cases that were solved, this helps insure an incremental change in law rather than radical.


Who won the supreme court case Denver Dispatch v US?

No one, the Denver Dispatch case is fake! It was created by the Constitution Works and Pearson Education to test the minds of lower and middle school students in how to interpret the law. What would you chose, newspapers right to print (Denver Dispatch) OR national security (United States Government)?


What are the five steps of historical method?

interpret, collect, synthesize, classify, analyze.

Related questions

Which party would interpret the Constitution word for word?

Federalists Its actually Anti-Federalists, I just took a quiz with this exact question and yeahhh.


How did the Federalist's and the republicans interpret the Constitution differently?

Republicans wanted to keep most power at the state or local level. They feared that a strong government would act like a monarchy. Federalists said the United States needed a strong federal government to hold the country together and deal with its problems.


Who wanted the national government to have the power to interpret the constitution for the federal system?

Federalists


Who wants the national government to have power to interpret the constitution for the federal system?

Federalists


Which group wanted the national government to have power to interpret the constitution for the federal system?

Federalists


How did hamilton and jefferson interpret the constitution differently-?

Hamilton was loose while Jefferson was very strict in the interpretation of the constitution.


What sums up the attitude of the founding fathers in regards to political parties?

They did not rally expect the emergence of political parties. Parties came into existence with the disagreement over how to interpret the Constitution. Hamiltion believed that the Constitution be interpreted loosley. Jefferson and Madison belived that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written. Follwers of Hamilton were Federalists and followers of Jefferson/Madison were Democratic-Republicans. These were the first political parties. They did not rally expect the emergence of political parties. Parties came into existence with the disagreement over how to interpret the Constitution. Hamiltion believed that the Constitution be interpreted loosley. Jefferson and Madison belived that the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written. Follwers of Hamilton were Federalists and followers of Jefferson/Madison were Democratic-Republicans. These were the first political parties.


In what two general ways does Congress reshape the Constitution?

The Constitution may undergo changes with a Constitutional Amendment or Constitutional Convention. The Supreme Court may not actually make changes to the Constitution, but may interpret the lines of the Constitution differently as time passes.


What two groups of Americans who might interpret our country's history differently?

name two groups of americans who might interpret our country's history differently


What court can interpret the Constitution?

Any court can interpret the constitution, but the US Supreme Court is the final arbiter on constitutionality.


Which group wanted the national government to have the power to interpret the constitutional for the federal system?

Federalists


Who reads the constitution word for word?

A "literalist" would interpret the Constitution just as it is written, rather than interpret its meaning in context.