I am speaking from a third-person view, as I have distanced myself from a couple that seemingly won't stop imposing their presence upon their daughters who are either recently married, engaged to be married, or seriously dating somebody. In this situation, this impossible couple that I speak of tends to be rather controlling. They also desire to be best friends with their daughters, and the men in their daughter's lives. Taken to an extreme, even the most friendly parents can wear out their welcome when they come around too often, and try and be too close to anybody their children are married to, or dating. Now, with this in mind, I had to distance myself from this couple because they were not particularly interested in what my wife and I were doing with OUR lives, and only concentrated on what was important to them, which was THEIR family. In addition to this, I noticed the rude and selfish behavior they imposed on their daughters. Why would they think that even after their daughters get married that they could continue to violate any boundaries of visiting too often, or expecting to be best friends with their daughters boyfriends and spouses. I have had overbearing relatives in my life in the past, and even without my wife to support my occasional disagreements with these imposing inlaws, I stood my ground and let my boundaries be known. There is nothing wrong with imposing boundaries on anybody, especially when it involves close contact with them, constant visits, or giving little or no warning of plans to visit for weekends and etc. Even though I believe in treating people with respect, I don't believe that being family with anybody includes having to be best friends. Stand your ground!! I don't know, what do you other people think out there?
Yes. Most inheritance laws make the surviving spouse an heir to a major portion of an estate if there is no will.
Some people are racists
Yes. If there is no surviving spouse, the next of kin are the children (equally and together). If there are no children then the next of kin is determined by the laws in the jurisdiction. Next of kin for legal purposes is set forth in the laws of intestacy.
Yes, if it is a reciprocating country
yes he did. this is for k12. haha :)
That means you are the surviving spouse and have all the rights of a surviving spouse under federal laws and state laws, especially under the state laws regarding inheritance.That means you are the surviving spouse and have all the rights of a surviving spouse under federal laws and state laws, especially under the state laws regarding inheritance.That means you are the surviving spouse and have all the rights of a surviving spouse under federal laws and state laws, especially under the state laws regarding inheritance.That means you are the surviving spouse and have all the rights of a surviving spouse under federal laws and state laws, especially under the state laws regarding inheritance.
It will depend on the laws in the particular state. But the new spouse is going to be deemed to have benefited from the non-payment of the support.
Up to the limit of child support laws.
If child dies, does his spouse have any legal claim with in-laws home?
You are not a legal heir-at-law of your in-laws. Your spouse is related to them by blood but you are not. You can check the laws of intestate succession in your state at the related question link below.
Is there a certain time frame that spouse have to be married to be entitled to for alimony/spousal support? Have only been married 5 years through Missouri.
occured
no
The laws vary from state to state, but in general, no, it is your spouse that inherits.
That depends on the reason for the objection. A spouse may contest the will for objections regarding the validity of the will. When a spouse is disinherited or would receive a larger portion under the laws that govern intestate estates, that spouse can usually file a claim with the judge for an intestate share depending on the laws in your jurisdiction.
"In-laws" refer to those people who are related to you by marriage (i.e.: your spouse's side of the family).
no In California, 20% of the income of a new spouse/SO can be used. In Ohio, the difference in "household" incomes can be use in a rebuttable presumption, but both are a two way street.