That answer is:
L to CL.
The number 50 is written as "L" in Roman numerals.
Those first 50 Roman Numerals would be:IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXIXIIXIIIXIVXVXVIXVIIXVIIIXIXXXXXIXXIIXXIIIXXIVXXVXXVIXXVIIXXVIIIXXIXXXXXXXIXXXIIXXXIIIXXXIVXXXVXXXVIXXXVIIXXXVIIIXXXIXXLXLIXLIIXLIIIXLIVXLVXLVIXLVIIXLVIIIXLIXL
150 is CL in Roman numerals. C = 100 L = 50
50 ^It's not '50', it's 'L'
L is 50 in roman numerals.
The number 50 is written as "L" in Roman numerals.
Those first 50 Roman Numerals would be:IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXXIXIIXIIIXIVXVXVIXVIIXVIIIXIXXXXXIXXIIXXIIIXXIVXXVXXVIXXVIIXXVIIIXXIXXXXXXXIXXXIIXXXIIIXXXIVXXXVXXXVIXXXVIIXXXVIIIXXXIXXLXLIXLIIXLIIIXLIVXLVXLVIXLVIIXLVIIIXLIXL
150 is CL in Roman numerals. C = 100 L = 50
The number 50 is represented by the Roman numeral L
It is simply: 50 = L as a Roman numeral
50 ^It's not '50', it's 'L'
L is 50 in roman numerals.
In Roman numerals, M = 500 L = 50 so, ML = 550
L-LX.
L-LXXVIII
L to C
150In the opinion of another contributor:In Roman numerals LC = 50 because LC = -50+100 = 50But in Roman numerals CL = 150 because CL = +100+50 = 150Answer LC is an incorrect way of writing 50, why would you write 50 less than 100 when you could simply write L (50)?Aditional input:The rule of subtraction isn't used, except between I's and X's. E.g, you wouldn't write IL for 49, rather this should be written as forty (XL) and nine (IX), or XLIX.Therefore LC doesn't make sense, or is 150.