answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In essence, the biochemical evidence for common descent is simply a specific set of examples of the same principle that all biological evidence for common descent adheres to: nested hierarchies. The same nested hierarchies that demonstrate common ancestry in comparative genomics, comparative morphology and developmental Biology, also demonstrate common ancestry in our metabolic pathways and other chemical molecules and processes in our cells.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Endogenous retroviral insertions (ERVs) are considered critical evidence for common ancestry.

Another piece of evidence is mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondria are organelles within cells with their own DNA. We have genetically engineered cows with rabbit mtDNA, proving the source of mtDNA is largely irrelevant to the functioning of the creature possessing it. The fact mtDNA similarities beautifully fit the nested hierarchy indicating common ancestry is further evidence of the accuracy of Darwin's theory of evolution.

Yet more evidence from molecular biology concerns the number of chromosomes humans and other primates have. Humans have 23 pairs, whereas other catarrhines (primates more closely related to us) have 24 pairs. At first glance this might seem like evidence against common ancestry, except for the fact we have identified the pair of monkey chromosomes that fused to reduce the normal number found in humans.

Another piece of molecular evidence is the GULO gene. L-gulonolactone oxidase is a gene that in most mammals expresses a protein that essentially synthesizes ascorbic acid. In humans this gene is non functioning, and it is non functioning in the same manner in most old world monkeys. Common ancestry explains this defect quite simply. No other theory accounts for it.
The number of chromosomes that the primates and humans have are the advances in molecular Biology provided the evidence for evolution.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The biochemistry in cells is the same for many difference species. This is evidence of a common ancestor between these species. Also, differences in biochemistries can show where certain domains of life separated in the tree of life.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

One example is the electron shuttle cytochrome C in the electron transport chain. This large biological construction is highly conserved among many species that are quite distant in morphological relationships but still use these same electron shuttles in their ETC, which is highly suggestive of shared common ancestry.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

biochemical evidence is i dont khown

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

animal

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How are biochemical similarities used by scientists to provide evidence for evolution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the biochemical evidence that supports evolution?

DNA


What biochemical evidence is there supporting evolution?

fossils


Biochemical analysts use similarities in what as evidence for evolutionary relationships?

Biochemical analysis uses similarities in DNA, amino acid sequences, as evidence for evolutionary relationships


What is the biochemical evidence that supports biological evolution?

DNA


How do scientists use similarities in early development as evidence for evolution?

By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.


Examples of biochemical evidence of evolution?

Physiological similarities suggest the species evolved from the same ancestor.


Why do scientists study proteins to find evidence for evolution?

Proteins reflect DNA sequences, so scientists study proteins to look for genetic similarities and differences in organisms.


Compare morphological and biochemical evidence supporting evolution?

The morphological evidence which is shown in fossils to modern animals supports evolution because some dinosaurs, for instance, had feathers and we can obviously see that trait today in birds. The biochemical evidence, which comes in the form of DNA comparison and amino acid similarities, shows that we related closely to monkeys and pigs, which suggests that we have close ancestors to these animals.


Is similarities an early development not evidence for evolution?

It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.


Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?

I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.


Biochemical analysis uses similarities in as evidence for evolutionary relationships.?

DNA sequences .


How is evidence from DNA useful in understanding the evolution of species?

DNA molecules contain the assembly instructions for every living creature. Scientists compare DNA from ancient and present creatures to identify genetic similarities among species. The genetic similarities among species is the main evidence of evolution theory.