In essence, the biochemical evidence for common descent is simply a specific set of examples of the same principle that all biological evidence for common descent adheres to: nested hierarchies. The same nested hierarchies that demonstrate common ancestry in comparative genomics, comparative morphology and developmental Biology, also demonstrate common ancestry in our metabolic pathways and other chemical molecules and processes in our cells.
Endogenous retroviral insertions (ERVs) are considered critical evidence for common ancestry.
Another piece of evidence is mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondria are organelles within cells with their own DNA. We have genetically engineered cows with rabbit mtDNA, proving the source of mtDNA is largely irrelevant to the functioning of the creature possessing it. The fact mtDNA similarities beautifully fit the nested hierarchy indicating common ancestry is further evidence of the accuracy of Darwin's theory of evolution.
Yet more evidence from molecular biology concerns the number of chromosomes humans and other primates have. Humans have 23 pairs, whereas other catarrhines (primates more closely related to us) have 24 pairs. At first glance this might seem like evidence against common ancestry, except for the fact we have identified the pair of monkey chromosomes that fused to reduce the normal number found in humans.
Another piece of molecular evidence is the GULO gene. L-gulonolactone oxidase is a gene that in most mammals expresses a protein that essentially synthesizes ascorbic acid. In humans this gene is non functioning, and it is non functioning in the same manner in most old world monkeys. Common ancestry explains this defect quite simply. No other theory accounts for it.
The number of chromosomes that the primates and humans have are the advances in molecular Biology provided the evidence for evolution.
The biochemistry in cells is the same for many difference species. This is evidence of a common ancestor between these species. Also, differences in biochemistries can show where certain domains of life separated in the tree of life.
One example is the electron shuttle cytochrome C in the electron transport chain. This large biological construction is highly conserved among many species that are quite distant in morphological relationships but still use these same electron shuttles in their ETC, which is highly suggestive of shared common ancestry.
biochemical evidence is i dont khown
animal
By using important equpment
i dont now
Scientists have made compounds with some of the elements in Group 18.
Particles matter to forensic scientists because particles can leave behind evidence of the criminal. Particles, only regarded as dust for example and not fibres etc hold great significance and can identify if a body has been moved etc, along with evidence such as livor mortis etc
Proteins are excellent sources for evidence of evolution, because their structure is determined genetically. Genes code for the amino acid sequences of proteins, so variation in protein structure can be directly linked to genetic variation. In fact, in the years prior to the ability to sequence DNA, the amino-acid sequences of proteins were used to infer the DNA sequences of the genes that coded for them. Since evolution is defined as genetic change within populations, proteins and their patterns of variation provide powerful evidence for that.
DNA
fossils
Biochemical analysis uses similarities in DNA, amino acid sequences, as evidence for evolutionary relationships
DNA
By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.
Physiological similarities suggest the species evolved from the same ancestor.
Proteins reflect DNA sequences, so scientists study proteins to look for genetic similarities and differences in organisms.
The morphological evidence which is shown in fossils to modern animals supports evolution because some dinosaurs, for instance, had feathers and we can obviously see that trait today in birds. The biochemical evidence, which comes in the form of DNA comparison and amino acid similarities, shows that we related closely to monkeys and pigs, which suggests that we have close ancestors to these animals.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.
DNA sequences .
DNA molecules contain the assembly instructions for every living creature. Scientists compare DNA from ancient and present creatures to identify genetic similarities among species. The genetic similarities among species is the main evidence of evolution theory.