0
How has the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment recently?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Supreme Court has only granted certiorari for a few cases focusing on gun control since its decision in US v. Cruikshank, (1875) that gun regulation is a states' rights issue not subject to federal statutes.
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1875)
The US Supreme Court held that gun control regulation was a state's rights issue, and that the Second Amendment didn't apply to the states.
Presser v. Illinois, 116 US 252 (1886)
Held that Illinois had a right to regulate and control military bodies, including those engaged simply in drilling and parades, and upheld its right require a permit for such activities when firearms are involved. Reaffirmed that the Second Amendment applies only to the federal government.
Miller v. Texas, 153 US 535 (1894)
The Court reaffirmed Cruikshank, but refused to hear Miller's claim that his Second Amendment rights applied under the Fourteenth Amendment on its merits because the Second Amendment question had not been preserved (was not invoked at trial and in the subsequent appeal).
US v. Miller, 307 US 174 (1939)
Upheld as constitutional the 1934 National Firearms Act that regulated, taxed and required registration of certain types of firearms (in this case, a sawed-off shotgun). Required that the petitioner show evidence in remand to the trial court that the shotgun contributed to the efficiency of a "well-regulated militia."
Lewis v. US, 445 US 55 (1980)
Upheld as constitutional Title VII of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1966, prohibiting convicted felons from possessing firearms.
In Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007), the Supreme Court denied certiorari on a US District Court case that overturned the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, a law banning residents of the District of Columbia from owning handguns, automatic firearms, and high-capacity semi-automatic firearms, as well as prohibiting possession of unregistered firearms. When the Supreme Court declines review of a case, the decision of the lower court is final.
Last Term, the Supreme Court heard District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008), a case that alleged Washington, DC, gun control laws were unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment of the Constitution protects Americans' right to bear arms as an individual liberty not specifically limited to the militia, and that the District of Columbia's requirement that guns within the home be unloaded, disassembled and locked were unconstitutional.
The decisions in both Parker and Heller applied only to the District of Columbia, which is federal territory, and not to the states, which are not currently bound by the Second Amendment (an unincorporated Amendment; see Related Questions for more information).
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010) The Supreme Court held self-protection is a fundamental right, and incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe Supreme Court has only granted certiorari for a few cases focusing on gun control since its decision in US v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1875), that gun regulation is a states' rights issue not subject to federal statutes. The most recent cases indicate the Second Amendment interpretation of the sitting Court.
In Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007), the Supreme Court denied certiorari on a US District Court case that overturned the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, a law banning residents of the District of Columbia from owning handguns, automatic firearms, and high-capacity semi-automatic firearms, as well as prohibiting possession of unregistered firearms. When the Supreme Court declines review of a case, the decision of the lower court is final.
Last Term, the Supreme Court heard District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008), a case that alleged Washington, DC, gun control laws were unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment of the Constitution protects Americans' right to bear arms as an individual liberty not specifically limited to the militia, and that the District of Columbia's requirement that guns within the home be unloaded, disassembled and locked were unconstitutional.
The decisions in both Parker and Heller applied only to the District of Columbia, which is federal territory, and not to the states, which are not currently bound by the Second Amendment (an unincorporated Amendment; see Related Questions for more information).
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010) The Supreme Court held self-protection is a fundamental right, and incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does the second amendment protect?
This amendment speaks to state militias and the right to bear arms. Added: In a recent Supreme Court ruling the right of individuals to keep and bear arms (at least at the Federal level) was how the Amendment was interpreted.
How has the Supreme Court interpreted the second amendment?
An interpretation of the second Amendment that corresponds with the ruling in District of Columbia vs. Heller is that citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.
The Second Amendment is controversial because it can interpreted to mean that citizens have the right to?
bear arms,, or own guns in other words
In what case did the Supreme Court refuse to incorporate the Second Amendment to the States via the 14th Amendment?
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1876)The US Supreme Court held the Second Amendment only applied to the Federal government, and that gun regulation was a state's rights issue.
Where can you find conflicting supreme court opinions on multiple amendment related cases?
I need to find a supreme court case based on the second amendment and write an essay contrasting two Court Justice's opinions.
What best describes the US Supreme Court's current interpretation of the right to bear arms?
The US Supreme Court recently incorporated (applied) the Second Amendment to the States in McDonald v. Chicago, (2010). The Court held, as it did in District of Columbia v. Heller,(2008), that the Second Amendment protected the public's right to possess firearms in their homes, and that the amendment was not intended solely for the formation of a militia, but for personal protection, as well. Restrictions against felons owning guns and other federal legislation still applies.
What is the 2 amendment of the US?
The 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms. Which means we have the right to own firearms. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the Security of a free State, the right of the people To keep and bear Arms , as all not be infringed.
What is second amendment called?
The second Amendment.
Which constitutional amendments are not incorporated?
The Seventh Amendment is not incorporated, and the Third and Eighth Amendments are only partially incorporated. The Third Amendment was upheld by the Second Circuit, making the Amendment binding on Connecticut, New York and Vermont, only. The Circuit Court decision has persuasive value for the other Circuits, but does not set a binding precedent on them.The Second Amendment was recently incorporated when the US Supreme Court released its decision in McDonald v. Chicago,561 US ___ (2010) on June 28, 2010.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Which supreme court case was the first to address the second amendement?
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1875)The US Supreme Court held that gun control regulation was a state's rights issue, and that the Second Amendment didn't apply to the states.[The Second Amendment was subsequently incorporated to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause in McDonald v. Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010), in a decision released June 28, 2010.]
What does the second amendment control?
The amendments to the Constitution do not control things but grant rights to the people of the United States. The Second Amendment gives individual citizens, according to a recent Supreme Court ruling ( at least at the Federal level ), the right to keep and bear arms.
How was the Second Amendment involved in the Supreme Court case US v. Cruikshank?
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1875)The US Supreme Court held that gun control regulation was a state's rights issue, and that the Second Amendment didn't apply to the states.[The Second Amendment was subsequently incorporated to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause in McDonald v. Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010), in a decision released June 28, 2010.]For more information, see Related Questions, below.
