It is generally thought that reports of cold fusion made in the past were in error, for one reason or another. It seems unlikely from theory. There is a Wikipedia article if you want to read it.
If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.
"Cold fusion" refers to fusion at (or near) room temperature, rather than the millions of degrees that are normally required. This has not been achieved so far - at least, not to any significant degree.
The monthly subscription price for a cold fusion web host depends on the caliber of the host. Basic plans are available for as low as $16.95/month, but can be $36.95/month if more disk space, bandwidth, and mail disk space is required.
Cold Fusion is a form of nuclear fusion intended to produce energy at room temperature (or near RT) as opposed to the extremely high temperatures required by today's understanding of modern physics This is only a hypothetical concept presented by many scientists who have laid claim to achieving such a mechanism. But as of today no one has come close to proving the phenomenon can occur under such conditions.After years of the scientific community rushing to find a solution to "cold fusion," it has been abandoned for the most part, and is regarded as a "close friend" of such things as unicorns and leprechauns, although one must never rule out an idea because the current technology makes it seem implausible!
Because nobody in other laboratories could reproduce the reported effects.
None. Cold fusion has never successfully been done. People claimed to have done it, but it was a lie and it has been debunked as bad science.
Cold Fusion - Doctor Who - was created in 1996.
Yes
If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.If you mean synthetic fusion, it is not. Technology is not ready yet to use this commercially; fusion is only done experimentally.
Cold Fusion - 2011 is rated/received certificates of: Germany:16 Singapore:PG13
neither cold fusion nor warp fields exist.
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons proposed cold fusion in 1989, although it was proven to be an invalid concept that did not work.
I think you mean "Cold Fusion" It is the (currently) hypothetical nuclear fusion reaction which happens at ambient temperatures?
"Hot" nuclear fusion (this is not the term normally used) is exactly what the name implies, the materials are heated, which provides them with enough energy to overcome the normal repulsion of protons. Cold nuclear fusion requires no heating and has not yet been proved, although dozens of Physicists and Electro-Chemists have claimed to have created cold fusion. Cold Fusion relies on other forces, such as pressure, to overcome the electrostatic force of repulsion.
Because it is
"Cold fusion" refers to fusion at (or near) room temperature, rather than the millions of degrees that are normally required. This has not been achieved so far - at least, not to any significant degree.
Cold fusion