It's because Americas government is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Without the citizens of the U.S there couldn't be a government, because we have the right to vote for our leaders.
It's because Americas government is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Without the citizens of the U.S there couldn't be a government, because we have the right to vote for our leaders.
It's because Americas government is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Without the citizens of the U.S there couldn't be a government, because we have the right to vote for our leaders.
It's because Americas government is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Without the citizens of the U.S there couldn't be a government, because we have the right to vote for our leaders.
Well, John Locke argued that government was a contract between the ruler and the people. And because the contract had been bound to both sides, the ruler's power would be limited. Just like in the Preamble where they were trying to form a new government and limit the power of the ruler of the government.
Provision of services is like a contract that is made between two people or organizations.
As John Locke said, you enter into a social contract with your government. Once that contract is broken, it is your DUTY to revolt and cause a revolution. This might not necessarily be a violent one, but it is your civic duty to protest against an injust government, like Egypt is doing right now. In face of a tyranous government you must challenge the authority and do what you can do remove the corrupt from power (ideally through legal ways). Civil unrest frightens governments no matter how strong they are. The governments serve their people and it is your responsability to remind them of that.
i think that government action is something that you do with the government. private action is like something you do as a family or a small grupe of people.
zakat for 8 types of people like poor , ... tax for the government but there is some Condition to be taken from the People not like we-see today
The social contract theory is the view that a persons moral and or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates used something like this theory in his work.
It didn't. A contract is an agreement between people for a service or product, but feudalism is when one man rules and all others do what he tells them. There is no contract between parties in a system like that. Out of that did develop laws that would eventually lead to contracts.
The social contract theory is the view that a persons moral and or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates used something like this theory in his work.
If the people are in control of the government, it is a republic. If the people have a say in the government (like how it works, who is in it, etc.), it is a democracy.