0
The use of film in the pursuit of historical truth is a much debated topic and only recently has become a major medium in the way people perceive the past. The general idea behind historical films is to get the historical facts out to the public, but also to entertain and it is the balance between these two that causes much dilemma in the debate between historians and film makers.
The balance is sometimes tipped towards the historians, and the film becomes a drab and boring documentary that doesn't appeal to the general public. If the film is tipped towards the filmmakers, we get an entertaining storyline and special effects, but lots of historical inaccuracies. This appeals to the general public and generates more revenue, which is why it is more common practice.
This being said, film is not a very reliable source for historical evidence as it is most likely plagued with inaccuracies and anachronisms.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is Historical genre?
A historical genre is a book or a film set in a past historic event which is telling the story of something that happened there like Schindlers List or Troy. (:
What are some good movies of Joan of Arc?
"The Passion of Joan of Arc" made in 1928 ; a silent film but probably the best . "The Trial of Joan of Arc" 1962 historical film - one of the better ones .
What are the factual historical differences between The Untouchables movie and Al Capone's real life?
Far too many to list here. "The Untouchables" was a terrific film, but needs to be viewed as historical fiction. In many spots, the movie barely even resembles the facts.
Does the holocaust exist?
no __ Given the mountain of evidence - film, eye witness, court testimony, photographs, official gov documents - that show it occurred, I'd say yes it did.
Is a film of the six wives of Henry viii a secondary or primary source?
Depends on if its a documentary or a movie. a documentary would be primary where as a movie or reenactment would be secondary
Is braveheart a reliable source for a historian?
No, it's based on a real person, but the film is Hollywood at its historical worst. I enjoyed the film as entertainment, but from an historical point of view it utter twaddle.
Is The Mummy a good film for history?
No! It's an enjoyable film, but not a good source of historical information. It is a fictional story and the film is made for entertainment.
What is the duration of Physical Evidence film?
The duration of The Evidence of the Film is 900.0 seconds.
When was Inadmissible Evidence - film - created?
Inadmissible Evidence - film - was created in 1968.
When was The Evidence of the Film created?
The Evidence of the Film was created on 1913-01-10.
Is a news film footage a primary source?
Yes, news film footage can be considered a primary source as it captures real-time events as they occur. It provides direct and unfiltered information about a particular event, making it a valuable resource for historical research or analysis.
Who is Gianna Michael's husband?
Gianna Michaels is an adult film actress who was born on June 6, 1983. There is no reliable source of information as to who her husband is, or if she is even married.
When was Physical Evidence - film - created?
Physical Evidence - film - was created on 1989-01-27.
What Saxon monk tries to kill Becket in France?
in the 1964 film, it was Brother John, a Saxon monk. There doesn't seem to be any historical evidence that this really happened.
Is the film Gallipoli by Peter Weir a valuable historical source?
It is a reliable source for the eternal attitudes and the basic outline of what happened but some details have been changed meaning that if you want specific evidence, you will have to look at primary sources. AN example of a change is some of the names of officers in charge have been switched around for what they actually did and their contribution to the war.
What are the release dates for The Evidence of the Film - 1913?
The Evidence of the Film - 1913 was released on: USA: 10 January 1913
Is the necklace story true in titantic?
The story of the "Heart of the Ocean" necklace in the movie Titanic is fictional and was created for the film's narrative. There is no historical evidence that such a necklace or similar story existed on the actual Titanic.
