The simplest way of doing this is not very efficient, but provides a quick development time. You want to take all of the elements of the array, add them to a Set, then retrieve them as an array again. Note that this will probably not preserve the order of elements in the array.
{
Object[] originalArray; // let's pretend this contains the data that
// you want to delete duplicates from
Set newSet = new HashSet();
for (Object o : originalArray) {
newSet.add(o);
}
// originalArray is now equal to the array without duplicates
originalArray = newSet.toArray();
}
Now the efficient, and more correct, solution.
This one will create a new array of the correct size without duplicates.
{
Object[] originalArray; // again, pretend this contains our original data
// new temporary array to hold non-duplicate data
Object[] newArray = new Object[originalArray.length];
// current index in the new array (also the number of non-dup elements)
int currentIndex = 0;
// loop through the original array...
for (int i = 0; i < originalArray.length; ++i) {
// contains => true iff newArray contains originalArray[i]
boolean contains = false;
// search through newArray to see if it contains an element equal
// to the element in originalArray[i]
for(int j = 0; j <= currentIndex; ++j) {
// if the same element is found, don't add it to the new array
if(originalArray[i].equals(newArray[j])) {
contains = true;
break;
}
}
// if we didn't find a duplicate, add the new element to the new array
if(!contains) {
// note: you may want to use a copy constructor, or a .clone()
// here if the situation warrants more than a shallow copy
newArray[currentIndex] = originalArray[i];
++currentIndex;
}
}
// OPTIONAL
// resize newArray (using _newArray) so that we don't have any null references
String[] _newArray = new String[currentIndex];
for(int i = 0; i < currentIndex; ++i) {
_newArray[i] = newArray[i];
}
}
---------
The second version is correct in theory. However, if you deal with large two- or more- dimensional arrays, you are in trouble, as with each new element in the destination array you will have to search through a greater number of elements.
This is especially true if you look for duplicates in more than one element of the array, for example looking in columns 'a' and 'b' of array
a1 b1 c1 d1
a2 b2 c2 d2
a3 b3 c3 d3
Drop in performance is unbelievable if you go over approx 1,000 records with majority or records being unique.
I am trying to test a couple of different approaches for large arrays. If anyone is interested, let me know, and I will keep you posted.
Sort the array then test adjacent members for equality.
Duplicate values have no effect on linear search other than to increase search times. When searching for a value that is duplicated, the index of the first element that matches the given value is returned. If you wish to return all indices that match the given value, you must either search the entire array to build a new array of indices, or sort the array so that all duplicates are allocated contiguously and return the range of indices.
To detect the duplicate, you will have to write a nested loop that compares each element with all the previous elements.To actually delete the duplicate, once you find it, you have to move over all the elements after the duplicate. If the order of the elements doesn't matter, it is faster to just move the LAST array element, overwriting the duplicate element. Use a variable to keep track how many elements of the array are "usable". For example, if your array had 10 elements, and you delete 1, the array size will still be 10... but (after moving the elements over) only 9 of those elements have useful information.
Yes.
Sort the array then traverse the array, printing the element values as you go.
Divide the array in half and get the median of each half
A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.A foreign can have null values and it can have duplicate values.
There is no such condition. The algorithm to locate the second largest number in an array of numbers is: Sort the array in descending order. Remove the duplicate values from the array. If there are two or more elements remaining, return the second number. If there is less than two elements remaining, return the NaN value (not a number).
Duplicate values have no effect on linear search other than to increase search times. When searching for a value that is duplicated, the index of the first element that matches the given value is returned. If you wish to return all indices that match the given value, you must either search the entire array to build a new array of indices, or sort the array so that all duplicates are allocated contiguously and return the range of indices.
yep foreign key can have duplicate values
Numeric array has numbers(+integers) that represent the values Associative array has strings that represent the values
To detect the duplicate, you will have to write a nested loop that compares each element with all the previous elements.To actually delete the duplicate, once you find it, you have to move over all the elements after the duplicate. If the order of the elements doesn't matter, it is faster to just move the LAST array element, overwriting the duplicate element. Use a variable to keep track how many elements of the array are "usable". For example, if your array had 10 elements, and you delete 1, the array size will still be 10... but (after moving the elements over) only 9 of those elements have useful information.
To merge arrays in PHP all you have to do is use the array_merge() function like shown below: <?php $array1 = array("Matt", "Michael", "Justin"); $array2 = array("Janice", "Janet", "Kylie"); $array3 = array_merge($array1, $array2); ?> One thing to remember when merging arrays is you might be creating duplicate results, if you don't want 2 or more of the same result in the array remember to use the function array_unique() to remove the duplicate results from it!
A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.A primary key field is always unique. Any other field that you have can be set to not allow duplicate values if necessary too.
Yes.
Sort the array then traverse the array, printing the element values as you go.
Divide the array in half and get the median of each half
to avoid the duplicate values