Both the Romans and the Greeks shared the Mediterranean but were separated by time, rather than geographical borders.
You see the Roman Empire (30 B.C. to 1450 A.D.) encircled the entire Mediterranean Sea (including modern day Greece). The empire stretched from Britain to Spain, the North shores of Africa to Egypt, from modern day Iran to Turkey, and across most of modern day Western Europe.
The Greek Empire (400 B.C. - 120 B.C.) was rather small until King Alexander of Macedon (Alexander the great) spread the kingdom from the Greek mainland and Egypt east across the Persian Empire.
However, the Geography of Italy varies greatly from that of Greece. Italy is, for the most part landlocked. As a peninsula it has much water frontage but the mainland cities are mostly inland. Greece is much more spread across vast archipelagos and has been known to be rocky. Each country has its share of mountains, cliffs, hills, and fertile soils.
Comparing geography- Italy is a long peninsula with Rome centrally located near the west coast, while Greece is a collection of coasts, mountains and islands. Communication down the Italian peninsula was by land coastal routes along which the Romans later built roads, whereas in Greece much communication was by sea, although there was a land route down the eastern side of the Greek peninsula.
Below are links to maps, one of ancient Greece, and one of ancient Rome, with Italy and the Roman Empire, which links to a number of other useful and/or pretty maps.
One's a City and the other's a Country. Dead easy.
yes
Because Greece is closer to the equator
The Etruscans changed Rome from a village of straw-roofed huts into a city of wood and brick buildings. They laid out streets, temples, and public buildings around a central square.Edit: The above one doesn't relate to geography though, and it doesn't mention Greece. Here is my answer:The landscape of Italy is similar to that of Greece, but the Apennines are not as rugged as Greece's mountains. As a result, the people in Italy were not split up into small, isolated communities like the Greeks. Italy had better farmland than Greece. With more capacity to produce food, Italy could support more people than Greece could.
Sparta was built near the evrota river which was a fresh water source. It was sourrounded by mountains (a natural defense system) and it's climate was arid but had more rainfall than most of greece.
Generally it is colder in England than in Greece.
He studied math and geography and that's it.
Because of its geography.
Because of its geography.
Because Greece is closer to the equator
Nubia has a higher elevation and less desert area than Egypt.
yes
It depends on where in ancient Greece. For example Sparta was very different than Athens.
Neither is better or worse. Just different.
no. history is a collection of writings on the events and accomplishments of human societies. which CAN effect geography, seeing as geography is the location of human nations.but where things are is a different topic than what happened there and who did it
The Etruscans changed Rome from a village of straw-roofed huts into a city of wood and brick buildings. They laid out streets, temples, and public buildings around a central square.Edit: The above one doesn't relate to geography though, and it doesn't mention Greece. Here is my answer:The landscape of Italy is similar to that of Greece, but the Apennines are not as rugged as Greece's mountains. As a result, the people in Italy were not split up into small, isolated communities like the Greeks. Italy had better farmland than Greece. With more capacity to produce food, Italy could support more people than Greece could.
Italy has fewer foreign debts and is much better than Greece's economy. Greece accounts for less than 2 per cent of the EU economy.
Italy is a peninsula; it is centrally located on the continent (shape of a boot); city of Rome is the center of Italy.
I don't know. But mby google has sum answers. Check it out. See ya.