Jamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how they're different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrims
Jamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how there different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrams
They were not very similar at all. Jamestown was settled by men who thought that going to America would be a chance to get rich. The people who settled Plymouth were going there because they were not pleased that their children were speaking Dutch as a native language. Prior to settling in Plymouth, the Pilgrims had fled to Holland in order to gain the right to worship as they saw fit, as practitioners of a faith similar to Calvinism, they did not approve of the beliefs and practices of the Anglican Church, many of which they believed to be unscriptural, that is against the teachings of The Bible. This occurred in 1608, and the Pilgrims had lived in Holland for 12 years before going to Plymouth. Oddly enough their original target was Virginia, but sea winds had blown their ship off course.
Neither settlement was similar. Jamestown was all men looking for gold and not really planning to make a colony, but have a short term stay. Plymouth was 60 people from the same English town and they were families planning to stay. They brought cattle, furniture, tools, and other things to start a colony. The only thing the same is they landed in unknown places with no resources.
This is a question you need to answer. Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson. I suggest you make a Venn diagram to help you answer the question.
they both had men and women in it and well idont i love marco!
both settlements suffered many deaths from starvation or disease
the hardships they suffered
they was collinizing
They both came for religious freedom that they did not have in Great Britan
They were both captured by Native Americans
Plymouth Rock was the place where the first pilgrims landed in the New World. They fled England as a religiously persecuted Christian minority. There are a few main differences between the Jamestown settlers and the pilgrims of Massachusetts. First of all, the pilgrims brought their families to the New World; the settlers of Jamestown were by and large, investors that came without families. Even though the pilgrims arrived some 20 years after the first of the Jamestown settlers arrived in Virginia, the population of the pilgrims quickly outgrew Jamestown because of the presence of women and ever growing families. Secondly, Jamestown was all about getting rich in the New World. Those that came were generally well to-do and James Smith, their ad hoc leader, claimed the men would rather dig for gold than plant crops. Therefore, many of them starved to death. An early chronicler wrote that, "The first settlers (to Jamestown) were a quarrelsome band of gentlemen and servants." In the first year alone, 50% of the first 104 settlers were dead. In 1608 the first 2 women finally arrived and by 1610, with new recruits, the population was up to 400. However, after the "starving time" in the winter of 1610, all but 65 survived. By 1616, 80% of the settlers that had come in the preceding decade were dead. Lastly, from reading this, the reasons for coming to the New World were quite different. One group came for riches and the other group, the pilgrims, came to establish their own brand of Protestant Christianity in the New World. They came fleeing religious persecution. To answer the question then, the Jamestown settlers were based in a capital enterprise, while the pilgrims at Plymouth Rock were based in a religious enterprise.
I put this but im not sure here it is: Pueblo revolt and pontiacs rebellion are alike because they are alike. and contrast by pontiacs has a leader.
They were wanted freedom.
Jamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how they're different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrimsJamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how there different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrams
Jamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how they're different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrimsJamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how there different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrams
Jamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how they're different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrimsJamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how there different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrams
how were experiences of jame stown settlers and pilgrams alike
They both came for religious freedom that they did not have in Great Britan
Jamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how they're different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrimsJamestown had no food due to the starving time and the pilgrims had food due to sharing with the Indians that's how there different and Jamestown people are settlers in the new world like the pilgrams
They were both captured by Native Americans
they both have men and women
There alike by their descendants and experiences the same kind of natural disasters.
They both came for religious freedom that they did not have in Great Britan
They were alike because alll the camps were filthy with odors, and there were many diseases. Also that there was barely any space to sleep.
Plymouth Rock was the place where the first pilgrims landed in the New World. They fled England as a religiously persecuted Christian minority. There are a few main differences between the Jamestown settlers and the pilgrims of Massachusetts. First of all, the pilgrims brought their families to the New World; the settlers of Jamestown were by and large, investors that came without families. Even though the pilgrims arrived some 20 years after the first of the Jamestown settlers arrived in Virginia, the population of the pilgrims quickly outgrew Jamestown because of the presence of women and ever growing families. Secondly, Jamestown was all about getting rich in the New World. Those that came were generally well to-do and James Smith, their ad hoc leader, claimed the men would rather dig for gold than plant crops. Therefore, many of them starved to death. An early chronicler wrote that, "The first settlers (to Jamestown) were a quarrelsome band of gentlemen and servants." In the first year alone, 50% of the first 104 settlers were dead. In 1608 the first 2 women finally arrived and by 1610, with new recruits, the population was up to 400. However, after the "starving time" in the winter of 1610, all but 65 survived. By 1616, 80% of the settlers that had come in the preceding decade were dead. Lastly, from reading this, the reasons for coming to the New World were quite different. One group came for riches and the other group, the pilgrims, came to establish their own brand of Protestant Christianity in the New World. They came fleeing religious persecution. To answer the question then, the Jamestown settlers were based in a capital enterprise, while the pilgrims at Plymouth Rock were based in a religious enterprise.