Want this question answered?
Your question is somewhat difficult to interpret, but perhaps what you mean to ask is, why do some movie characters work better as main characters than they would as minor characters. The answer would be that if the more interesting characters are the main characters, then the movie itself will be more interesting.
Bad
Laika's characters is life saving and amusing
You describe them just the same as you would describe a real person: give a physical description, describe their personality and emotions, and tell about their goals or desires.
Brave
Because not all the characters were necessary for the story of the 4th movie, I mean, Pintel and Ragetti would have been cool but other characters weren't needed
I would personally like to be in a Batman movie series because all of the characters are so distinct.
WikiAnswers will not write your homework for you, but we WILL help you learn how to do it yourself! Click on the Related Questions for even more information. Write sentences the way you speak - just pretend you are telling this to a friend, and write down what you would say. What would you tell them about this topic? How would you describe the characters to your friend? How would you tell your friend what activities are going on in the story? If you just start writing, you will be through with your assignment before you know it!
i would describe it funny silly interesting wild wierd crazy and exciting maybe even loud (i got that from the movie)
No, the closest thing that would describe this would be "The NeverEnding Story, part three".
the secondary characters would be mr.ewell,tom,meyella and atticus they do not play very big parts in the play and movie the main character would be scout because everything is from her perspective
The pronoun I would use to describe the O. Henry story "After Twenty Years" is the possessive pronoun his. It is his story, his appointment, his old friend, his downfall.