If an unlicensed uninsured driver has consent of the car owner to drive in a lot and is in an accident does the driver at fault still have to pay?

Yes, (subject to policy exclusions and your state law regarding uninsured unlicensed drivers), the person that is negligent, at fault is the one responsible for the damages to the 'innocent' party. Regardless of their licensing/insurance in most cases.

Improve Answer Discuss the question "If an unlicensed uninsured driver has consent of the car owner to drive in a lot and is in an accident does the driver at fault still have to pay?" Watch Question

First answer by Mama lori. Last edit by Mama lori. Contributor trust: 295 [recommend contributor]. Question popularity: 23 [recommend question]

Also see on Answers.com

Research your answer:

Answers.com > Wiki Answers > Categories > Business and Finance > Insurance > Auto Insurance > Auto Accidents and Insurance Claims > If an unlicensed uninsured driver has consent of the car owner to drive in a lot and is in an accident does the driver at fault still have to pay?

Our contributors said this page should be displayed for the questions below. (Where do these come from)
If any of these are not a genuine rephrasing of the question, please help out and edit these alternates.
Unlicensed driver hits pole?  Neither driver nor owner has insurance on a car who is at fault?  Can co-signer sue buyer for letting unlicensed driver drive vehicle?  Is there liabilty to car owner if is driven by unlicensed driver and?  Who is responsible for what if you let your 17 year old unlicensed daughter drive your uninsured truck and knocks down a stone mailbox?  What are options when unlicensed driver hits pedestrian and the owner of car has lowest possible coverage?  Is the owner of the car is liable to the recless driver who drive his car and have an accident?  What will happen to a georgia driver who allows a person without a liscence to drive?