If the man signed the birth certificate or was married to the mother at the time was born, in many states that would make him the presumptive and legal father with all rights and responsibilities (including child support) incurred. The term is "equitable paternity" and the circumstances and locations where it may apply vary.
For specific information, you should confer with an attorney with a specialty in family law in your state of residence.
The answer to this question is very delicate, for two reasons. First, a lot of people use the terms "support" and "custody" without fully understanding that the legal meanings of those words are not necessarily the same as their meaning in ordinary use. Second, each state has its own laws, so we can only give you a general answer based on the "usual" state. You really should consult a lawyer if you want a definitive answer.
That said: If by "support" you mean "child support" and by "doesn't have custody" you mean she actually doesn't have the child whatsoever (legally and physically), then no, the biological father doesn't have to pay support.
First of all, we need to split child support from maintenance. Maintenance is another form of support to which an ex-wife might be entitled regardless of whether there were children. I assume for purposes of this answer that you mean child support, so I won't address maintenance issues.
Child support is something that is paid from one parent to the other parent because that parent has primary or residential custody of the child. The mother does NOT need to have sole or exclusive custody in order to be entitled to child support. If she has joint custody, but is the primary caretaker/residential parent, she is still entitled to child support. (This trips a lot of people up. They think because the mother doesn't have sole custody, they don't have to pay child support.)
If the father's situation is one where the mother doesn't have any custody then she is not entitled to child support. Even if she has legal custody, but has put the child in the hands of someone else (usually other family members), she is still entitled to child support if she is the legal custodian. On the other hand, if the father is sole custodian, or is the primary caretaker/residential parent, the mother is not entitled to child support.
If the father still thinks, based on this answer, that the mother is not entitled to child support, he should NOT stop paying. He should petition the court that issued the child support order to modify that order due to a change in facts/law. If he just stopped payments, he would get in even more hot water.
AnswerNo. If the biological mother does not have legal custodyof the child the court will not enter a child support order with her as the payee. However, the father can be ordered to pay child support to the person who does have legal custody.
In most states if his name is on the birth certificate and/or he was married to the mother at the time, yes he will still have to pay child support.
Yes, if: the child was conceived/born during the marriage; or, he signed an acknowledgment of paternity.
You need to consult with an attorney in your jurisdiction who can review your situation and explain your options under your state laws. You need to act as soon as possible.
no
A child does not have to have the same last name as the biological father to receive child support from that father.
Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.Her child's biological father if she has obtained a court order for child support.
Yes , the biological father will be held legally responsible for the support of his child .
A step father has no legal obligation to support a step child.
No, only the biological father will be assessed child support.
Not sure what a "non biological father" is, but the only thing that could happen is that the (former) payor is excused from paying future support. He cannot recover the support already paid.
Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.Yes. The father is responsible for child support whether or not the parents were ever married. It is the biological connection that creates the legal obligation to support a child.
YOUR
Yes. The child does not need to be named after the father for him to be obliged to pay child support. He needs to be the biological father, that's all. Child support obligations arise from being the biological parent of a child and not on the child's name.
The law allows for retroactive support, but there are a lot of factors to consider.
You are not the one to get child support all over again, but the man who has been paying wrongly all these year is entitled to get his money back from your biological father. He have to sue him for that. You have been paid for and supported already. If you are not of legal age yet and is entitled to child support you have to have a DNA test or something proving he is your biological father so you can take him to court so he can pay for you the years left until you are an adult.