I assume this is a rhetorical question? But, determining unfitness is up to the court, and can be highly interpretive. Not being involved is common as 60% of fathers are denied access to the children, according to the to the US Dept. of Health & Human Services study, "Survey of Absentee Parents". As for child support. Was a claim filed. Many fathers pay without one, but it is not considered child support. Also, mothers run off with children, not notifying him of her location.
If both of the parents have a joint legal custody arrangement, you have to give the noncustodial parent that information. If you have sole custody of the child, you do not have to share that information with the noncustodial parent.
If there's not custody agreement, than there's no custodial parent, so it could be interpreted as interference with Florida Jurisdiction.
no
Alimony to the non-custodial parent may still be ordered; depends on the circumstances. Child support payments are based on both the needs of the child and the ability of the parent to provide them.
Generally, no.
Read your support order. You can't usually be joint custody and non-custodial at the same time.
Because you are not married and filed for child support. You have to pay child support to one parent and that has to be to the one with custody. If you both had 50/50 custody it could look differently but you only have visitation.
No, that alone is not a reason to terminate custody. The non-custodial parent should be paying child support.
No, the parent whom the child began residing would need to file for custody and also support before the original custodial parent would be obligated. However there would be no guarantee that a court would grant the motion.
Yes, child support and custodial arrangements are separate issues and are treated as such by the court.
The obligation should not end, but rather transferred to the now nun-custodial parent.
The custodial parent is the parent with custody/guardianship of the child.