No. Texas Family Code section 154.069 states that no spousal income may be considered when computing child support. That's either the custodial or noncustodial parent's spouse.
Here is a link:
http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/FA/content/htm/fa.005.00.000154.00.htm
Here is the text:
§ 154.069. NET RESOURCES OF SPOUSE. (a) The court may
not add any portion of the net resources of a spouse to the net
resources of an obligor or obligee in order to calculate the amount
of child support to be ordered.
(b) The court may not subtract the needs of a spouse, or of a
dependent of a spouse, from the net resources of the obligor or
obligee.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, § 1, eff. April 20, 1995.
Not under the Maryland Guidelines, but an argument can be made using a Rebuttable Presumption. However, that's a two way street and can be used to lower the payments. see link
Maryland does not have that specific provision, but all child support is rebuttable.
Only through a Rebuttable Presumption argument. see link
No, He has a moral obligation to support his child financially and emotionally. Unless his income has decreased support should remain the same.
Typically courts will not penalize a child by reducing support payments because a parent has had another child because this is not seen as being in the best interest of the child.
Neither state currently has that provision, as California does, this does not preclude a legislative change in the future to address the number of motions to modify support for fathers being laid off. Massachusetts addressed it by doubling their rates two years ago. An argument for this can be presented to the court under a rebuttable presumption, but that can be a two way street, resulting in a lower and not higher payment. see links
No the new spouse is not responsible.
no see links
Highly unlikely.
We don't understand what the new spouse has to do with it. The child is not his, and he is not mentioned in the divorce degree or any judgments..
yes he is from will smith's previous marriage.
no... not her/his child ....that is called innocent spouse and the wages of a spouse that is not responsible for someone else's child when it is not biologically theirs.
You no longer have a legal relationship to a step-child from a previous marriage.