Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...

In the bid for colonies did colonized nations benefit from colonization or suffer exploitation at the hands of the imperialistic nations?

[Edit]

Answer

First of all, your terminology is all wrong.

They weren't Colonised Nations. They were not nations at all, in that they had no organised government, no structure of any kind. That made it easy for the in-coming Europeans to take control, as they had military and economic power that the indigenous people couldn't match.

In many instances, the colonies were IMPROVED by being developed and educated by the colonisers, especially the British. They set up schools and taught the local people the value of education and training. In many cases the local people became the direct managers and supervisors for the British owners, and became wealthy enough to rise above their original class. Example would be Kenya, Ceylon, and India.

In the case of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, the original inhabitants were allowed to continue to live as they had previously, but the new setttlers made huge improvements to the land and eventually became independant nations of their own. A definite improvement, in my opinion.

Answer

The above answer is extremely insuffecient. Did the original inhabitants of lands conquered by imperialist empires suffer? Each of the hundreds of cases of imperialism is unique, but on balance there was much more suffering than there was benefit. In the case of aboriginal peoples of North America, Australia, and New Zealand, there's little doubt these people suffered tremendously at the hands of European imperialists. They lost virtually all of their land, self-determination, liberty, culture, health, and resources. What little they did gain in terms of economic growth, access to technology, government services and protection (virtually a cruel joke to include this in the conversation) can hardly make up for the terrible injustices committed by the imperialist societies.

Improve Answer Discuss the question "In the bid for colonies did colonized nations benefit from colonization or suffer exploitation at the hands of the imperialistic nations?" Watch Question

First answer by Buntingj. Last edit by Yankee6161. Contributor trust: 1 [recommend contributor]. Question popularity: 44 [recommend question]

Research your answer:

Answers.com > Wiki Answers > Categories > History Politics and Society > In the bid for colonies did colonized nations benefit from colonization or suffer exploitation at the hands of the imperialistic nations?

Our contributors said this page should be displayed for the questions below. (Where do these come from)
If any of these are not a genuine rephrasing of the question, please help out and edit these alternates.
Who colonized the 13 colonies?  What nations were in alliences?  Why nations would establish colonies?  First nations contact with europieans?  Why did some nations establish colonies?  How did it affect newly colonized nations?  How did colonies benefit from colonization?  The nations firstpoliticalparties were the?  Did smaller nations suffer due to imperialism?  13 colonies in order which they were colonized?  How did small nations benefit from colonization?  How did smaller nations suffer more than gained?  Why did colonized nations benifit from colonization?  How did Indians suffer as a result of being colonized?  Which were the first colonies colonized by the swedish?  Did smaller nations benefit from colonization or suffer?  How did the British colonization effect the first nations of Canada?  Did the US suffer exploitation at the hands of larger imperilistic nations?  Did smaller nations benefit from colonization or suffer exploitation at the hands of larger imperialistic nations?  In the bid for colonies smaller nations suffered exploitation in the hands of larger imperialistic nations?