In the case Katz v United State what was Katz occupation?

Burton Marks and Harvey A. Schneider argued for the petitioner (Katz). And John S. Martin, Jr. argued for the respondent (United States).

Charles Katz was convicted in California of illegal gambling. He had used a public pay phone booth in Los Angeles to place bets in Miami and Boston. Unbeknownst to Katz, the FBI had recorded his...

The majority ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. They ruled that Mr. Katz had a "reasonable expectation of privacy" inside the enclosed phone booth; and that the Fourth...

It changed how the Fourth Amendment was interpreted. Prior to Katz a physical intrusion into some protected space was required before the Fourth Amendment was violated. In Katz the majority ruled...

Justice Black wrote a dissent because he disagreed with the majority opinion. In Katz, the majority changed how the Fourth Amendment was interpreted. Prior to Katz a physical intrusion into some...