Want this question answered?
Provide the opponent's arguement.
An answering argument in a debate.
Rebuttal means an opposing argument in a debate, means a rebute in a war. A rebuttal is the claim, or proof, that an accusation or argument is false. It used to be (but is no longer used in this meaning) the repelling of an attack in a battle. ~or in easier terns it is a refutation or contradiction.
I believe you mean REBUTTAL. The defense's response to the "closing" argument of the prosecutor or plaintiff is known as the 'rebuttal.'
Yes, in a debate or argument, refutation is the act of proving an argument or statement to be false. Rebuttal is the act of responding to an argument or criticism to challenge its validity. Both terms involve responding to an opposing viewpoint.
The related terms of rebuttal and refutation are similar in meaning but distinct in use. A rebuttal regards the chance to respond to an argument with further information. A refutation is the specific rejection to an aspect of argument, often through the use of evidence. That being said a rebuttal can include the use of refutation to further its argument strength.
co
She strongly disagreed with the editorial so she quickly wrote a scathing rebuttal.
The burden of rebuttal refers to the responsibility of the opposing side in a debate or argument to respond to and counter the arguments or evidence presented by the other side. It requires providing counterarguments or evidence that challenges the validity or effectiveness of the original argument. Failure to meet the burden of rebuttal can weaken a position in a debate.
A verbal or oral response to an argument presenting an opposite viewpoint is known as a rebuttal.
There are particular components every sound argument must contain. The basic components are to state the claim, the grounds, qualifier, warrant, backing, and the rebuttal.
(in the US) In criminal trials - the defense ALWAYS makes the final closing argument before the judge and/or jury.However, according to the rules of criminal procedure, the prosecution does retain a right (if it wishes) to make a rebuttal argument. Sometimes the prosecution choosese to exercise this right, sometimes they do not.If the prosecution chooses to exercise the right to make a rebuttal argument there is no right to a "re-rebuttal" by the defense.