Is Fallout 3 as good as Fallout 2?

Fallout 3 is a very good game...It has a bigger area and map to explore but has less challenges. Fallout 2 was a good game but not as much of action as Fallout 3 has. Actually, Fallout 2 could be defeated without even using an gun or more fighting other than the opening. To decide on which game is better is an matter of opinion. Fallout 3 is a lot more faster and has a different style of play. Fallout 2 is an turn based game and has more ways to play/win the game unlike the new Fallout 3, which depends on shooting too much. In the end, it is your decision that counts, not some self conceited opinion from another. <-----you spelled this wrong =^.^= ill get this let the grown ups talk.

dear lord this is someone else speaking not the guy who did the first answer 3 is a lot better then 2 better graphics better guns armor and its made by a better company (take it from the guy who can spell "another") FalloutFox

Note by Facesforce: I did originally spell various words incorrectly, which I have fixed now. More to the point, FalloutFox. You did not address the question at hand, which is crucial to updating WikiAwnsers. On top of this, you only presented your opinion, which was biased towards new-gene games. I originally changed the answer to show a more balanced point of view, in which some of the older fans of the fallout series can appreciate as well as the newer fans of the fps fallout. I only left your admission due to the fact it helps give the reader a more clear image of the type of conceited opinions that people may use to sway the readers to believe that the older fallout games. Also, I have taken liberty to correct your spelling errors. Have a wonderful day- Facesforce