0
yes it is... Action is a noun and to a preposition. The sentence is grammatically correct.
Cheers
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is grammatically correct had ceased or ceased?
Both are correct in proper context. The preterite indicates an action in the past: "The fighting ceased." The pluperfect indicates action prior to a main verb in the past: "It was quiet because the fighting had ceased."
How would one start a sentence off with the word while?
There are scenarios in which it is possible to start a sentence with the word "while," and still be grammatically correct. It may be used in statements that highlight simultaneous action.
Which is correct shallnt you have been eating or shall you haven't been eating?
Neither of these options is grammatically correct. The correct way to phrase it would be "Shall you have been eating?" This is the interrogative form of the future perfect tense, which asks about a completed action that will happen in the future.
Is the sentence 'i will shift in a year' correct?
It is grammatically correct, although without its context it is fairly meaningless. Usage of "will" instead of "shall" implies a willingness in this future action, although the distinction is generally not recognized nowadays. The verb "shift" (without an object as here) is used rather colloquially to mean "move" or "do something".
How do you spell stragie?
Perhaps you mean 'strategy', also called a 'plan of action'.
Is the phrase come in action correct English when used in the same manner as get into action Example The police were called to come in action?
It is correct grammatically, but not idiomatic. We say the police were called to TAKE action, to GET INTO action, or to BECOME ACTIVE.
Is the phrase come in action correct English when used in the same manner as get into action. Example The police were called to come in action.?
It is correct grammatically, but not idiomatic. We say the police were called to TAKE action, to GET INTO action, or to BECOME ACTIVE.
Is it correct to say --this was not expected out of you?
Yes, that phrase is grammatically correct. It implies that the action or behavior was surprising because it was not what was anticipated from the person in question.
Is this sentence correct she will have been reading the book when you get there?
Yes, the sentence "She will have been reading the book when you get there" is grammatically correct. It describes an action that will be ongoing (reading the book) before another action (you getting there) in the future.
What is grammatically correct had ceased or ceased?
Both are correct in proper context. The preterite indicates an action in the past: "The fighting ceased." The pluperfect indicates action prior to a main verb in the past: "It was quiet because the fighting had ceased."
Is it Grammatically Correct to say Mignosi Fine Food Market?
"Mignosi Fine Food Market" is just a noun with modifiers. It has no verb of action or being.
Which is grammatically correct - I have uploaded the files or I had uploaded the files?
Both are correct with different meaning. The perfect ( have uploaded) is for action completed in the present: I have uploaded the files, the job is done now. The pluperfect ( had uploaded) is used for action completed in the past: I had uploaded the files before you asked me to.
How would one start a sentence off with the word while?
There are scenarios in which it is possible to start a sentence with the word "while," and still be grammatically correct. It may be used in statements that highlight simultaneous action.
What is a plan or course of action?
a strategy
An overall plan of action?
strategy
What is an overall plan of action?
a strategy
Which is correct shallnt you have been eating or shall you haven't been eating?
Neither of these options is grammatically correct. The correct way to phrase it would be "Shall you have been eating?" This is the interrogative form of the future perfect tense, which asks about a completed action that will happen in the future.
