The surviving spouse is only responsible for credit card debt if the account were joint or the married couple lived in a community property state; (Texas and Wisconsin treat marital debt differently than other CP states). Death benefits from life insurance with a named beneficiary or SS death benefit are not subject to creditor action for repayment of the deceased debts.
California is a community property state. Essentially, anything financial is owned or the responsibility of both entirely.
No.
The life insurance benefit will be paid to the deceased's estate.
Life Insurance benefits are usually not subject to taxes. It is a benefit, not a gift or income.
A certificate of marriage is not required to collect on life insurance. Life insurance proceeds will be paid only to the named beneficiary/beneficiaries on the policy. If all beneficiaries are deceased, then the benefit will be paid to the deceased insured's estate.
The policy would not be subject to seizure during the person's lifetime and it Could not be used to pay tax arrearages if there is a beneficiary named at the time of the insured death. If the issue concerns tax owed by a deceased and a death benefit received by the deceased's spouse who was a joint filer, then the surviving spouse would be liable for said tax arrearages.
In case of demise of the life insurance policy holder, only the NOMINEE is the beneficiary to get the amount. In case nomination is not done, the legal heir of the deceased person can apply before the insurance authority for the death benefit.
If question refers to whether or not the insurance benefit is subject to seizure for child support arrearages. If that is the case, the answer would be yes. Any monies garnered from the insurance benefit that belongs to the obligated parent would be subject to garnishment for child support arrearages. If the named beneficiary of the insurance benefit is deceased and the grandparent(s) are still living, they can legally have the policy amended and another beneficiary named. In that case the monies would not be a part of the deceased grandson's estate and not subject to probate action nor distribution for his debts.
Yes, it is possible to be responsible. The primary insurance holder is always responsible for all the debts incurred. And it is considered a benefit to both parties.
Yes, you can decline the benefit. Speak to the insurance company about how.
In India, the death benefit to the nominee of the deceased insured, is100% tax exempted u/s.10,10(d) of the Income Tax Act.
In addition to the death certificate, some life companies require a proof of age so they may cross check with the stated age at the time the life contract was purchased. Sorry to say, but many insurance applicants lie about their age at the time of purchase. And just so you understand, if an insurance company finds [that] the deceased was younger than stated, they will pay a larger benefit; conversely, if the deceased was older than stated, they will pay a lesser benefit.
If an insured has a policy where there is no named beneficiary, or the named beneficiary is deceased, then the benefit will be paid to the insured's estate.
The estate is primarily responsible. However, a spouse is normally considered to benefit from such debt and can be held responsible.