Want this question answered?
Correlation alone cannot be able to complicate causation.
NO. correlation just (implies) a relationship ... for example, both may be caused by the same thing.
No! Correlation by itself is not sufficient to infer or prove causation.
An example of a fallacy is reducto ad absurdum. This is when you exaggerate someone's argument to a ridiculous extent and then proceed to criticize the result.
does not prove
correlation implies the cause and effect relationship,, but casuality doesn't imply correlation.
Correlation is when two things are related or have similar properties and they can exist independently. Causation means that one thing made the other thing happen.
Causation cannot be determined.
Correlation is when two things are related or have similar properties. They can exist independently. Causation means that one thing made the other thing happen
It confuses correlation with causation
Causation, correlation...
The three conditions necessary for causation between variables are covariance (relationship between variables), temporal precedence (the cause must precede the effect in time), and elimination of plausible alternative explanations (other possible causes are ruled out).