Yes. The flesh of a fish is a protein and is meat.
The whole debate is due to the literal definition of meat. You can use a general definition from a dictionary, the criteria used for the food pyramid, a religious definition, or a scientific assessment. The reason a debate even exists is because people use different definitions.
Some within the Catholic religion follow a latin translation for definition. This specifically excludes fish, seafood, and insects from the definition. Other translate the definition of "meat" into "RED MEAT".
There is no right or wrong. That fish flesh is protein is not arguable, fish is higher in proteins than red meat.
Yes fish is in the meat group because fish has meat right?
Fish is a meat. It is a white meat, like chicken.
Yes, it is a white meat fish.
No it is not red meat. Scientifically, fish is not meat. Fish is fish, just like vegetables are vegetables.
Sushimi is fish. So if you consider fish a meat, yes, it has meat in it. If you are a vegetarian and eat fish, no it would not.
It is not possible to remove the meat of a fish without killing the fish.
Fish isn't really meat, but yes, fish is low in fat.
it is a meat
The other name for fish meat is seafood!
Fish comes from the sea and meat comes from land
They both have meat but fish is a better meat having much less fat and more much protein. Sometimes fish is not concidered meat as meat is often used for beef, chicken and swine.
fish. Fishy fish.