Frenchman in good company will sometimes refer to themselves jokingly as "frogs", but otherwise the term is taken to be disparaging, offensive and in poor taste.
As for being racist, it certainly could be when used by a person of a different 'race" than the person referred to. It is more likely, however, to be considered a "hate" word when used between people of the same race, say an Ontario Englishman to a Quebec Frenchman.
In any case, the term has no place in decent society.
Cocorico; but I sincerely hope that you are not asking so that you can be a racist.
The French refer to the food frog legs as "The Cuisses de Grenouille".
The Australian term (not slang) for French fries is "chips".
A frog is called 'une grenouille' (fem.) in French.
It technically wouldn't be racist
Français and Française are French slang equivalents of the English word "frog." The word translates as grenouille when referencing the amphibian whose legs French language speakers eat and as "Frenchman" (case 1) or "Frenchwoman" (example 2) when referring to the French as frog-eaters. The respective pronunciations will be "fraw-seh" or "fraw-sez" for the slang term and "gruh-nwee" for the animal in French.
darte frog
Yes. Paki is considered a racist term for a Pakistani.
It depends on how one uses the term "white racist". To some, white racist is someone who is white and they are also racist. To others, however, a white racist is someone who is racist exclusively towards white people.
grenouille
racists are french
No, there are no racist terms in the English language. Language is beautiful and all words have value.